Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO <br />ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS <br />NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Ms. Decker advised that Item 6.c. was continued to the meeting of May 14, 2008, at the <br />request of the applicant. <br /> <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> <br />There were no items for consideration. <br /> <br />6.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br /> <br />a. PAP-116, Paul Esser, Appellant (PV-167, Rich and Lori Lortz, applicants) <br />Appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s approval of an application of an application <br />for variances from the Municipal Code to: (1) reduce the street side yard setback <br />of a corner lot from the required ten feet to eight inches (measured from eave to <br />soundwall) for an existing accessory structure and to five feet for an existing pool; <br />(2) reduce the side yard setback from the required three feet to one foot, eight <br />inches and reduce the rear yard setback from the required five feet to eight inches <br />(measured from the eave to the property line) for a second accessory structure; <br />and (3) retain the existing eight-foot tall hedges in the front yard where a <br />maximum height of six feet is allowed. The property is located at 2402 Crestline <br />Road and is zoned R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that as the Zoning Administrator, she would be able to answer any <br />specific questions from that perspective, and that all other questions should be directed <br />towards Ms. Amos. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos summarized the staff report, and described the background, scope and layout <br />of the proposed project, as well as the background of the Zoning Administrator hearing <br />and appeal. <br /> <br />Staff recommended that the Planning Commission deny Case PAP-116, thereby <br />upholding the Zoning Administrator’s approval of Case PV-167, subject to Exhibit B, <br />Conditions of Approval. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br /> <br />Paul Esser, appellant, stated that he opposed the Zoning Administrator’s approval of the <br />subject variance, and displayed views of the applicants’ property as seen from his home. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 19, 2008 Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />