15 - Laserfiche WebLink

resolution was circulated and the MC agreed on the language included in the resolution. The City of Pleasanton was the first member agency to pass the resolution of support for the MC Fee increase (September 2, 2008). The City of Livermore, the City of Dublin and Alameda County presented revised language in their respective resolutions that does not support the original direction of the agreed-upon resolution. This new language in Alameda County's, the City of Livermore's and the City of Dublin's resolutions resolves to follow the priorities established by the Triangle Study. The Triangle Study is a prioritization document established by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency. The prioritization of projects established in the Triangle Study, as it is currently written, does rank MC project B-1 (580/680 interchange southbound to eastbound) and MC project B-2 (5~h eastbound through lane on I-580) above MC project A-2 (State Route 84). The City of Pleasanton did not support the Triangle Study prioritization, because it placed A-2 at the bottom of the list. The City is working with Livermore, Dublin and Alameda County to move project A-2 above projects B-1 and B-2, but have not yet come to a formal agreement. Livermore's, Dublin's and Alameda County's resolutions are shown in Attachments 2, 3 and 4. Should any of the member agencies not support the adoption of the fee program by resolution, the fee will continue as it currently exists, as shown in Figure 1. Submitted by: .~~~~~ Brian Dolan Director of Community Development Fiscal Review: Approv by: ..- David P. Culver Nelson Fi Iho Finance Director City Manager Attachments: 1. City of Pleasanton Resolution (adopted September 2, 2008) 2. City of Livermore Resolution 3. City of Dublin Resolution 4. Alameda County Resolution Page 8 of 8