PC 2006-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2006-13 Page Two 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Based on the proposal, the proposed facility would be a compatible use to the nearby commercial establishments. The building where the proposed facility is to be located is a freestanding building with its parking lot. As conditioned, the number of parking spaces available on site would meet the parking demands generated from the activities offered by the proposed use. Based on the proposal, the City Traffic Engineer has determined that the proposed use would not result in significant increases in vehicle trip volume when compared to the existing use at the subject site. To ensure that the proposed use would to impose adverse impacts onto the surrounding uses, a condition has been included addressing this issue. Furthermore, a condition has been added requiring the facility management exercise its discretion in assigning walk-in appointment and other functions/ events, such as birthday parties, to avoid parking issue. Therefore, this finding can be made with the proposed conditions of approval. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. As conditioned, the proposed use will comply with all provisions and requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and the approved PUD development plan if the proposed minor modification is approved by the City Council. As with any conditional use permit, the use permit may be suspended or revoked if the conditions are not met. Therefore, the proposed use will comply with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, this finding can be made with the proposed conditions of approval. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed conditional use would be compatible with the existing uses in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. Approves Case PCUP-161, the application of Sherman Balch/SuperFranks for a conditional use permit to operate an indoor recreational facility in an existing building located at 5341 Owens Court, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made part of this case by reference.