PC 102407 - Laserfiche WebLink

_ Commissioner Narum noted that either way, the bulk of the parking would be in the back and suggested that motion-sensitive lighting be placed in the back. Mr. Nguyen noted that there was adequate lighting, but they may need to add more lighting if the entrance were to be placed there. Ms. Nguyen noted that there must be an 18-foot height clearance for the inflatable structure, which would not be possible if the lobby were placed in the back. Commissioner Blank noted that there was a change since staff had indicated that the applicant would be amenable to flipping the floor plan. He acknowledged the costs that would be involved, but he did not like the idea of the children walking down the side of the building. He was also very concerned that if the entrance were to be placed in the front parking lot, parents would double park on Commerce Circle, drop the kids off and get back in their car. He was not comfortable with the parking layout in relation to the entrance. Chairperson Fox inquired whether staff should continue to work with the applicants and return to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Blank noted that since the motion was on the table, the Commission could vote on this matter and see what transpired. He suggested that alternatively, the motion could be tabled to give staff an opportunity to work with the applicant to develop an altemative floor plan before presenting it at the next meeting. Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether both driveways were about 30 feet wide and whether they were both two-way drives. He further inquired whether a protective walkway or bollards could be included. Commissioner Narum noted that the 30 feet covered two different grades. Ms. Decker noted that if the Planning Commission felt they could support the project with the modified conditions, they could vote on that; the applicant could appeal the decision to City Council if needed. If the Commissioners did not feel comfortable with an alternative of having the children enter in the front of the building, staff could work with the applicants with respect to the floor plan. She understood from the applicant that they were now not comfortable with the revised conditions. Commissioner Blank called the question. Commissioner Olson noted that if it was his business, he would have the party manager meet the children at the curb in the front and then walk the child into the facility. The supervising adult would park the car and sign the child in. Commissioner Blank noted that was a business decision. Commissioner Olson noted that he was concerned about the safety of the children in the _ parking lot. He inquired whether a condition could be included reflecting that alternative. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 24, 2007 Page 14 of 40