PC 102407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank inquired whether the parking could be conditioned to be in the front. Commissioner Pearce would like the entire layout to be flipped so the children did not have to walk around the building. Commissioner Narum expressed strong concern about children running into the parking lot after the party was over. Commissioner Blank noted that establishments such as Chuck E. Cheese kept a very tight control on the children and did not allow them to leave the building unaccompanied. Commissioner Pearce noted that it was her experience with similar establishments that the children often streamed out the door and would like to condition the use to prevent that. She suggested codifying the applicants' plan for enforcing child-safe exit control. Ms. Decker noted that the applicants had communicated their intent to not allow children to exit the building freely without supervision. She suggested that the Planning Commission craft a condition that stated that children shall not be allowed to exit the structure without a supervisory adult or a parent If that were to be violated, it would become a Code Enforcement matter that may result in the applicant returning to the Planning Commission for further review. Commissioner Blank did not wish to become so specific as to manage the business and suggested language such as "Children shall not be allowed to leave the premises unless accompanied by a parent or supervisory adult." Ms. Decker noted that the Commissioners seemed to suggest language such as, "The applicant shall work with staff to modify the floor plan, such that entry and exiting shall be from the parking lot area, and obtain all required building permits to provide adequate facilities." The applicants need to have a building permit to provide soundproofing on the interior walls; prior to further work, they must work with staff on the floor plan. At that point, they would work with staff with respect to the entry and exiting operations. Ms. Decker noted that staff had some minor revisions to the conditions: 1. Condition No. 2 on page 8: The date September 27, 2903, should read September 27, 2007. 2. Condition No. 2 on page 8: "...may be approved by the Planning Department if found to be in substantial conformance with he the approval." 3. Condition No. 3 on page 8: "If necessary, the Planning Commission may modify or add conditions to mitigate such impacts, or may void the said-use permit." 4. Condition No. 6 on Wage S: "Prior to beginning operation of the facility, the operator of the facility t~shall install soundproofing measures...." PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 24, 2007 Page 12 of 40