PC 12/09/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

_ Mr. Iserson referenced the staff report and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, site development standazds, design, parking, traffic/circulation, neighborhood comments, and municipal code conformance. In conclusion, he stated that staff s recommendation is that the Planning Commission approve Case UP-98-76/Z-98-311 by making the use permit findings as listed in Section IV subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." Further, that the Commission approve Case Z-98-310 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "C." Discussion ensued between the Commission and Mr. Iserson relating to whether the residence will have a one- or two-car garage, clarification of differences between a teaz down and an addition, construction to be done on the barn located on the property, permits previously issued, the dimensions of the house, the possibility of splitting lots in the future, whether the chain link fence on the property is permanent, impacts on trees and landscaping, and the property not being in the Downtown Revitalization District. Mr. Iserson noted that a condition should be added to Exhibit "B" prohibiting installation of a stove in the garage structure. Commissioner Cooper disclosed that he viewed the property and met with Mr. Knapp; Vice-Chairperson Roberts disclosed that she had a conversation with Mr. Knapp and Ms. Rodondi; Commissioner Maas disclosed that she viewed the property with Commissioner Cooper and Mr. Knapp; and Commissioner Kameny disclosed he had a phone conversation with Mr. Knapp and has viewed the property. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED - Michael Johnstone, architect, informed the Commission that there is no intention of demolishing the present structure. He noted that the design of the residence was selected due to it complementing the area and that the structure is oriented to the back of property to lessen impact on the neighborhood. He noted that the applicant has collected 70-plus neighborhood signatures approving the design of the structure. In response to a concern expressed by Commissioner Cooper relating to a large two-story structure being built in a neighborhood of one-story residences, Mr. Johnstone reiterated that the design of the structure has been oriented to the back of property to lessen structural impacts on the neighbors. Jack Chestnut, applicant, stated that he is attempting to restore the chazacter of the house in a way that complements the neighborhood and downtown Pleasanton. He noted that the barn will be renovated and that building permits have been issued to perform electrical work on property. He noted that signatures have been collected from neighbors and noted there were no complaints received; however, he stated that five neighbors declined to sign the petition due to their reluctance to get involved. He informed the Commission that no final decision has been made for the color of the residence; however, the residence will be a light tone with white trim and dazk detail and that the roof will be of high quality asphalt shingle. In conclusion, he stated that he is attempting to build a residence that is functional for himself, yet accommodates the neighborhood. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Maas relating to building aone-story residence rather than a two-story residence, Mr. Chestnut stated that asingle-story residence would not accommodate a pool between the residence and barn, and the wrap-around porch. He further noted that trees will be planted on property line to create privacy for Mr. Knapp. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 December 9, 1998