My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/09/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 12/09/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:57:31 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 10:11:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
12/9/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stated if the project is approved, he would be opposed to having the EVA dropped out of the conditions <br />and spoke in favor of elimination of Lot 23. <br />Vice-Chairperson Roberts stated that the applicant has tried to accommodate the Commission's requests, <br />such as the trail, and stated she had no problem with the development itself. She expressed her <br />concurrence with eliminating Lot 23 and expressed concern with removal of trees; however, she <br />mentioned that where walnut trees have been saved, they didn't last. She expressed concern with <br />overcrowding of schools and growth management and spoke in favor of extending growth management <br />timelines to ensure adequate schools. She stated her preference for compacted decomposed granite for <br />trails and with nothing harder than asphalt being utilized. She hopes Rose Avenue doesn't go through, <br />but spoke in favor of traffic calming devices for Rose Avenue and the 33-foot total setbacks for <br />residences. She noted that the Rose Avenue extension will help Black Avenue traffic. <br />Discussion ensued relating to traffic at build out, environmental impacts, growth management issues, <br />and not approving the application until issues are resolved. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, to deny Case <br />PUD-98-06. Further, that staff be directed to initiate a Specific Plan for remaining unapproved <br />Rose Avenue properly and recommend to the City Council a Specific Plan for area. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Cooper, Sullivan and Vice-Chairperson Roberts* <br />NOES: Commissioners Kameny and Maas <br />ABSENT: Chairperson Kumaran <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />The motion passed on a 3-2 vote. <br />Resolution No. PC-98-93 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />*See January 13, 1999 minutes (Item 2., Approval of Minutes; and Item 7.c., Matters Initiated by <br />Commission Members). <br />Mr. Iserson noted that the applicant has 15 days to appeal to the City Council in writing the decision of <br />the Planning Commission. <br />d. Extension to Tentative Tract Maa 6581 (Castlewood Heights), Black Mountain <br />Development <br />Application for an extension to an approved vesting tentative tract map for the subdivision <br />of an approximately 18.6 acre site into 29 single-family residential lots generally located at <br />the southeast corner of the Sunol Boulevard undercrossing of I-680. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR (Low Density Residential) District. <br />Mr. Plucker referenced the staff report and highlighted key areas contained in the report including <br />background information and the project description. In conclusion, he stated that staffs recommendation <br />is that the Planning Commission approve the vesting tentative map time extension for one year subject <br />to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B." <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 December 9, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.