PC 11/23/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

requested that aschool-impact analysis also be performed as part of the EIR and that development of bicycle routes be evaluated. He noted that due to the sensitivity of this area and development of other projects, a specific plan should be developed. He concluded by stating that the EIR should address noise, specifically noise from I-580 since trucks are going uphill in this area. Commissioner Kameny noted his concern with the visual effects of development from the valley floor. He expressed concurrence with Commissioner Cooper's statement that no development is not a viable option and stated that the plan needs to be readdressed relating to concerns relating to traffic, water and grading issues. In conclusion, he noted that his additional concerns have been addressed by other commissioners. Vice-Chairperson Roberts expressed concern with the visibility of the project, not complying with the General Plan in building projects at the high end of the density range up against the urban growth boundary, traffic and circulation in the azea, utilization of flat pad grading, impacts on trees, and drainage issues. She expressed concurrence with Commissioner Cooper's suggestion of a wildlife corridor. She requested that a fiscal impact study be conducted to determine the lowest number of residences to be built in the area and still provide infrastructure. She stated that the townhouse alternative is an interesting option but she would have a concern with visibility if they had to be two-stories. She questioned if the homes were held to one-story, would the visual impacts be mitigated? Commissioner Cooper noted that he met with Ms. Lester and toured the property. PUBLIC HEARING WAS REOPENED Jim Vernon, representative of Ms. Lester, stated that the Commissioners' comments are well thought out and will be addressed. He stated that open space is a priority and the developer is cooperating with the Regional Park District to develop something beneficial to the community, the development, and the County. Further, that the developer is sensitive to wildlife issues and will address wildlife routes through creeks. Open space is a priority and Shea will build a superior project. He noted a water problem and said that density will be dependent on water. Tom Gambel, Senior Vice President of Shea Homes, addressed the Commissioners' concerns and stated that the developer will be identifying the most superior alternatives, identifying and addressing urban growth boundaries, and pazk and wildlife issues. Further, that development will be located in the valleys, not on the hillside, and alternatives relating to building of multi-family homes and townhomes will be addressed. Single-story homes might be possible -their "Tapestry" project in Livennore has 50% single-story and is very populaz. Discussion ensued relating to dirt movement and different methods of grading. In response to a question of what Shea Homes would like to see developed on the site, Mr. Gambel replied 50 to 70 units on 121 acres. When asked why they planned to go outside the Urban Growth Boundary, Mr. Gambel replied that in eazlier discussions with the City, he thought there might be room to adjust the boundary line to allow development on some azeas while emphasizing the retention of other natural azeas. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 November 23, 1998