PC 09/09/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

center. She expressed concern with the safety of children being dropped off on Ray Street. She concluded by stating that due to the applicant's non-compliance with codes and being a poor neighbor, _ she would support staff s recommendation to deny the application for a conditional use permit. Commissioner Sullivan stated he concurred with his fellow commissioners' statements. He noted concern with code enforcement, lack of compliance with permit and future conditions being met based on past performance, lack of suitability of location for this business, and problems with existing traffic and pedestrian traffic created by children. He concluded by noting that he would support staff s recommendation to deny the application for a conditional use permit. Chairperson Kumaran expressed his apprehension with closing an existing business and that it only should be done as a last resort. He noted that the applicant seemed to want to make changes in the signage, closing business at an eazlier hour, and keeping the door closed during classes; however, he stated that due to the applicant's non-conformance with codes, lack of compliance with neighbors' concerns and this martial arts business being better situated in another location, he would support staffs recommendation to deny the application for a conditional use permit. Commissioner Dove noted his desire to have a discussion later in the meeting relating to enforcement of codes so the owners and renters of property have some degree of responsibility in that area. A motion was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Roberts, denying Case UP-98-46. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Cooper, Maas, Roberts, Sullivan, and Chairperson Kumazan NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-98-69 was entered and adopted as motioned. Mr. Iserson noted that the applicant has 15 days to appeal, in writing, the decision of the Planning Commission for consideration by the City Council. c. Z-98-234, Lee A. Parodi Application for a modification to the approved construction hours for design review Case A-98-14 (design review approval to construct atwo-story, 3,242-square foot custom home) located at 326 Diamond Court to allow exterior construction on Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Zoning for the property is R-1-8,500 (single-family residential) District. Mr. Iserson referenced a staff reported dated September 9, 1998, and highlighted key azeas contained in the staff report including the proposal, analysis and neighborhood comment. In conclusion, Mr. Iserson stated that staff s recommendation is to deny Case Z-98-234. However, he advised that if the Planning PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 September 9, 1998