PC 07/08/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioner Maas, Roberts, and Chairperson Cooper NOES: Commissioner Kumazan and Sullivan ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-98-52 was entered and adopted as motion. Commissioner Kumazan noted for the record that he is voting "no" due to exacerbation of the pazking situation and due to not being in favor of the in -lieu parking fees. Commissioner Sullivan noted for the record that he is voting "no" because he does not feel there has been an adequate look at that traffic in the area and also because different things can be done with the in-lieu-pazking fees. Commissioner Maas stated her support was due to the recommendation for the amendment to the Municipal Code and also with Council's action last evening accelerating the recovery or collection of the in-lieu-pazking fees. d. Vesting Tentative Tract Maa 7008. Standard Pacific Of Northern California Application for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 7008 to subdivide an approximately 16.1-acre site located at the end of Stoneridge Drive on the southeast corner of Trevor Parkway and Stoneridge Drive into 143 single-family lots. The subject property is zone PUD (Planned Unit Development) - LDR and MDR (Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential) District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report. He noted that in May 1998, the City Council approved the PUD to create the 143 single-locking homes for this development. He continued by stating the applicant has filed a tentative subdivision map to begin the process of creating the actual lots in conformity with the PUD approval. Further, he noted that the lot size for the project would vary from 2700 to 3500 square feet. Mr. Iserson noted that one parcel will be created for a recreation azea and one parcel for an easement that would be dedicated to the City. Mr. Iserson continued by stating that one issue that was addressed during the PUD was the alignment of Stoneridge Drive, which is not an issue to be decided upon at this time; however, in conjunction with past considerations of the Stoneridge azea, there aze two possible alignments for Stoneridge Drive which will be decided through the Eastside Specific Plan process. In addition, he stated that the applicant has shown alignment in two different ways, and that two lots are being held out until the last phase of development to account for the possibility of alignment. Mr. Iserson continued by stating that there was a requirement for Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA), and that due to alignment, would either be located off of Stoneridge Drive and Wisteria Circle or Chicory Circle. Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 July 8, 1998