My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/10/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 06/10/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:01:05 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:33:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
06/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Roberts inquired if the number of parking spaces required in the entire business pazk is <br />determined solely by building square footage or if consideration is given to the fact that commercial <br />automotive repair businesses require a lazger number of people coming in and out. <br />Mr. Iserson replied that for certain uses, staff has determined pazking requirements based on the number <br />of employees, and in most cases, the computation based on employees resulted in fewer parking spaces <br />than if it were based on square footage. He stated that in general, automotive repair businesses are <br />commercial and open to the public and that the Code requires only one parking space for every <br />500 squaze feet for this use. However, because of the congestion on many streets in Stanley Business <br />Park, staff has increased that requirement to one pazking space for every 350 square feet. <br />Commissioner Roberts asked what is meant be "permitted by right." Mr. Iserson replied that a permitted <br />use needs no special approval or permit for a business person to operate.. In Stanley Business Park, <br />some businesses which require conditional use permits elsewhere are permitted uses and require only <br />design review if new buildings aze proposed. <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired if Mr. Ghorbani has indicated that he would install a monument sign <br />and if there are City design guidelines for this type of signage. Mr. Iserson replied that Mr. Ghorbani <br />has not submitted any application for a monument sign. He added that the City has a sign ordinance that <br />governs monument signs and requires the applicant to go through a sign design review process. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that automotive repair shops use a lot of chemicals and solvents. He <br />asked if discharge permits for these chemicals aze required for this business and, if so, which agency <br />controls them. Mr. Higdon answered that each business has its own manhole and that its discharge goes <br />directly to the sanitary sewer line operated by the City. If certain chemicals or dischazges are detected <br />down the stream, tests aze conducted in the manhole to determine if any illegal discharges are present in <br />the sewer system. Any chemical detected is identified, and the business is then sent a notice. <br />Mr. Higdon added that testing is done only when there is reason to suspect that chemicals are present or <br />when the problem arises. <br />Mr. Iserson stated that the applicant is required to submit a plan to the Fire Department regazding the <br />storage and disposal of potentially hazardous materials. The Fire Department then conducts inspections <br />to ensure that these materials aze safely stored and not discharged into the sewer. There is no other <br />regulatory agency that requires special dischazge permit. <br />Commissioner Sullivan inquired what criteria are used to determine whether notification should be done <br />fora 300-foot or a 1,000-foot radius. He stated that for an application like this, the entire business park <br />should be notified so that business owners in the park would have advance notice and the opportunity to <br />have some input on the application. <br />Mr. Iserson replied that the City Council has indicated which mailing radius to use for different <br />proposals. Projects requiring Council action through an ordinance such as a PUD, General Plan <br />amendment, and rezoning require at least a 1,000-foot radius from the property line; while the basic <br />State law of a 300-foot radius applies for other projects such as a design review, conditional use permit, <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 June 10, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.