My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/10/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 06/10/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:01:05 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:33:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
06/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Iserson informed the Commission that a contribution is being made to the City which would <br />enhance the walking tour in the Downtown area in the form of the or similaz aztistic work on Main <br />Street. It would depict Pleasanton's history as well as some of the older buildings and scenes from <br />Pleasanton's past. <br />Commissioner Sullivan requested Mr. Iserson to expand the handouts on vacant residential and <br />commercial lots in the City. Mr. Iserson explained the data and figures on both lists. <br />Commissioner Sullivan suggested that the Commission look at some of these lots and recommend which <br />parcels could have go through a specific plan study in view of future development. Mr. Iserson replied <br />that some of the pazcels already have or are in the process of having specific plans such as the Happy <br />Valley and Vineyard Corridor azeas, while others are going through the process of such a determination <br />such as the Eastside Plan by the Stoneridge Drive azea. <br />Commissioner Dove stated that certain projects like the Lund Ranch will be considered as a major PUD <br />from the standpoint of design, which would provide the opportunity for some individuality. <br />Commissioner Sullivan requested Mr. Iserson to go through the vacant residential lots and prepare a list <br />with an accompanying map identifying the lots already covered by a specific plan, the lots that will be <br />covered by upcoming specific plans, and those which already have approved PUD development plans <br />but have not yet constructed units. Mr. Iserson stated that he would have this to the Commission in the <br />neaz future. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br />a. Future Planning Calendaz <br />There were none. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />There were none <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />There were none. <br />10. REFERRALS <br />There were none. <br />11. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S INFORMATION <br />There were none. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 19 June 10, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.