PC 05/27/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commission Kumaran asked Mr. Iserson to explain the logic behind Conditions 5 and 6. He responded that those conditions are standard on every residential project based upon a recommendation made by the City Council several yeazs ago. The water availability condition was initiated during the drought years to advise developers that water service could be an issue, and sewer capacity has long been a concern in the Valley. Mr. Higdon elaborated and stated that since some projects take many years to actually obtain building permits, it is difficult during that time to predict whether the limit of sewer capacity will be met. Therefore, the condition is regularly included to protect the City from lawsuits. Chair Cooper asked for clazification relating to Condition No. 8. Mr. Iserson stated that staff felt it was necessary to define the property lines between the pazcels. In addition, in response to a question by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Iserson further clarified the setbacks relating to parcel 3. In response to a question by Commissioner Sullivan relating to a noise study, Mr. Higdon advised him that such a study was done along First Street in connection with the widening of the First Street Bridge. He stated that there is some reason for concern with backyard noise levels. Commissioner Sullivan also commented that the FAR for the proposed homes is slightly higher than in some homes in the surrounding area. Mr. Iserson pointed out that there is a wide range of lot and house sizes in the area, noting that there are both smaller and larger homes there, with the maximum FAR according to the zoning being 40%. However, the average is in the 30% to 35% range. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Nick Stoddazd, azchitect, represented the applicant. He thanked Mr. Iserson and his staff for the thorough staff report and for their continual assistance on the project. He feels that staffs input and suggestions have made the outcome of the project much more attractive. Commissioner Roberts commented that the gazage doors on lots 2 and 3 would be visible from the front porches and asked Mr. Stoddard whether they aze standard garage doors. He advised her that they aze very unusual, fancy doors with glass windows, and the style is meant to simulate the old-fashioned look of the swinging garage door. In addition, Mr. Stoddazd described in detail the wrap-around porches and access to the front of the homes. He also described the siding that would be used following an inquiry from Commissioner Maas. Chair Cooper commended Mr. Stoddard for doing a very nice job on the architectural design. However, he expressed concern with air pollution from the chimneys and asked whether there is any pollution control planned. Mr. Stoddard stated that no special plan has been implemented, although he will comply with all current codes relating to chimney construction. Isaac Rodrigues stated that he was the realtor for the previous and current owners of the property. He explained the tremendous support he has received from Mr. Iserson and his staff. He stated that he and the owners aze very pleased with the results and feel the project will positively benefit the City. In response to a question by Chair Cooper, Mr. Rodrigues stated that the market value of the homes is expected to be in the mid $400k range. Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 May 27, 1998