Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Sullivan asked whether the surrounding property owners had reviewed the plans for <br />_ this project and whether they were happy with the conditions of approval. Mr. Iserson stated that <br />although the neighbors reviewed the previous similar plan and were notified of this application, he is <br />not sure whether they reviewed the modified plans. However, he noted that except for the issue with <br />the trees, he has received no comments from the surrounding neighbors. <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Kumaran, Mr. Iserson clarified the available parking <br />spaces. Commissioner Kumaran stated that he would like to see at least one additional parking space <br />included; however, Mr. Iserson stated staff feels there are no other opportunities for additional <br />parking. <br />Chair Cooper asked whether the applicant would consider installing doors to the parking garages, and <br />Mr. Iserson noted that that was previously discussed with the applicant and he would probably agree <br />to do so. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br />Frank Auf Der Maur, Jr., 4482 Pleasanton Avenue, represented the applicant. He thanked staff for <br />their assistance on the project and stated that he is in agreement with the staff report and conditions of <br />approval. In response to Commissioner Roberts' question relating to affordable housing units, he <br />stated that the issue never arose during the applicantion process, although he expects the rent to be <br />between $700 and $800 per month, per unit. He also advised her that he intends to occupy the office <br />building for his own business along with two employees. <br />In response to Commissioner Sullivan's concern with surrounding property owners, he stated that he <br />reviewed the site plans with each of them and has spent a considerable amount of time discussing the <br />project with them. He has received no negative comments relating to the project. In addition, he <br />confirmed that he would not be opposed to installing garage doors. <br />Mr. Auf Der Maur also addressed the parking concern and reported that he discussed the possibility of <br />including tandem parking spaces, but was advised by staff that they are not usually approved. <br />However, he agreed that additional parking would be beneficial and agreed to include tandem parking <br />spaces if it could be worked out with staff. <br />Commissioner Sullivan commented that it would nice to include an open space area for picnics and <br />barbecues. Mr. Auf Der Maur pointed out the small open space which could be used for outdoor <br />relaxation or barbecues. <br />A brief discussion took place relating to the possibility for tandem parking. Mr. Iserson stated that <br />the City Municipal Code does not allow tandem parking, although the City has been flexible in <br />allowing it in certain PUD's. He stated that if the Commission felt strongly enough about the issue, <br />staff would be supportive of the recommendation and would work with the applicant to see whether <br />tandem parking can be achieved. A variance would be needed since the property is not zoned PUD. <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 May 13, 1998 <br />