PC 04/29/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Rasmussen clarified the recommendations made regarding the location of the urban growth boundary line. He stated that he understood that the line would not be relocated or adjusted to allow for additional homes, but rather would be clazified as to actual location. After a brief discussion, Mr. Rasmussen clarified that the Commission's recommendation is that it has agreed to define the urban growth boundary line, without changing it to allow for additional housing. A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Dove, recommending that the Commission support requests 1, 3, and 4 of the requests of the South Happy Valley Loop area as clarified above, but to modify request no. 5 to include the AG friendly language, but not deleting the word "permanent" as it relates to open space. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Barker, Dove, Kumaran, and Wright and Chair Cooper NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None The motion carried. Mr. Rasmussen clarified the pazcels that this would include. It would includes lots 115 through 125. With regard to the Spotorno property, Commissioner Wright suggested deleting Trail #7 as previously recommended by the Pazks and Recreation Commission. With regazd to the density for the flat azea, he agrees with the drawing presentation by Mr. Rasmussen this evening. He feels that it should have one housing unit per each 1-1/2 acre. He also agrees to the 22 lots with the 5-acre provision for the open space portion of it. He would also like for the three houses facing Alisal Street, as well as the others by the Church property to be 1 1/2 acre sites with an FAR no greater than 25%. He feels that some of the homes should be clustered and require a minimum of at least 100 feet between others. With that type of wording, he would agree to the 22 lots. He would also consider atrade-off on the FAR if they included single story homes. He also agreed to the request made by Mr. MacDonald at last week's meeting on behalf of Mr. Spotorno to allow a family compound on a defined area of the north slope. Commissioner Wright feels that all parties who would benefit from the bypass road should shaze a pro-rata cost. He stated that the premise has been used that the Spotornos should pay for 100 percent of the road basically because it's servicing their housing. However, he pointed out that there will be no road to the golf course unless it goes through the Spotorno property and through the housing area. He commented that the Commission addressed the same issues with Greenbriaz. He feels the Spotornos have valid arguments relating to the traffic study, since the golf course has a much larger percentage of traffic than the development. He feels strongly that apro-rata share is the right thing to do with the bypass road, rather than allocating 100% of the cost to the Spotorno developers. Commissioner Bazker agreed to delete Trail #7. She does not support 22 homes on 32 acres because this is more than the one unit per two-acre zoning. She supports the two-acre zoning without the five-acre open space dedication. If that is not supported ,then she would like to see concessions on the FAR with Planning Commission Page 11 April 29, 1998