My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/08/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 04/08/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:59:10 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:26:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
04/08/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Dove asked whether there has been a name change of Reflection Drive to California <br />Avenue. He noted that the new self-storage buildings are going up, and they aze still identifying the <br />address as Reflection Drive. Mr. Iserson agreed to look into the matter. <br />In addition, Commissioner Dove noted that he spoke with Greg Plucker about the right-of--way that Mr. <br />Jones has to his property and asked whether the new road explained tonight will eventually take the <br />hammerhead out and go all the way through. He feels that when something is built on the Thompson <br />property, the right-of--way can possibly be eliminated. <br />Commissioner Wright mentioned the Commission's invitation to the Sycamore Neighborhood <br />Association's meeting. He asked Ms. Seto whether the Commission could accept such an invitation. <br />Ms. Seto responded that under the Brown Act, when a City Commission attends a local organization's <br />meeting, all members can attend. However, the only requirement is that the meeting be open to the <br />public, which would require public notice. She further stated that the Commission cannot make <br />decisions on the issues presented and should make it clear that their role in attending the meeting is for <br />informational purposes only. She said that it is acceptable to speak and share opinions, but to be careful <br />not to pre-judge the issues before they are actually presented to the Planning Commission at a formal <br />meeting. Finally, she stated that if upon arrival, the Commissioners find that the meeting is not open to <br />the public, they should not stay on. <br />Chair Cooper reported that he spoke with Cazl Morrison about a presentation on the clean water revival <br />project. Mr. Morrison stated he would be willing to give a presentation to the Commission if they so <br />- desired. The Commission agreed, and Chair Cooper offered to schedule a date. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br />a. Future Plannine Calendar <br />Chair Cooper noted that a Special Meeting has been scheduled for April 29, 1998 regazding the <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan and EIR. <br />b. Actions of the Citv Council <br />Chair Cooper reported that the City Council overturned the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation relating to the Frost property subdivision. <br />Ms. Seto stated that Mr. Patel has appealed the Planning Commission's decision on his request <br />for a major modification of the PUD design guidelines. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />There were none. <br />9. COMMUNICATIONS <br />There were none: <br />Planning Commission Page 26 April 8, 1998 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.