PC 04/08/1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Iserson described the proposed architecture and design, noting that the correct elevations are shown - on sheet A-3 (sheet A-0 is a previous version). He reported that staff and the applicant have agreed that the site is important because it serves as an entrance to the Downtown azea. Staff has worked with the applicant very closely on this issue. Mr. Iserson further described the interesting features of the building and commented that Larry Cannon has participated in the design. The only issue with the building is that staff feels the proposed color is a bit dark and would like it to be lighter. A condition of approval has been included to address that issue. Mr. Iserson also pointed out that the applicant has decided they would like to have a rectangular window on the second floor as opposed to the curved windows as shown on A-3. The applicant has agreed to work with staff on this design change, and staff feels that would be appropriate. The landscaping plan was briefly described, including trees, street furniture, and a plaza at the main entrance. Mr. Iserson commented that the current plan does not show a rear fence, but the applicant wants to have one. Therefore, staff has included a condition for asix-foot wood fence. However, after the staff report was prepared, a neighbor expressed concern that such a fence would block visibility to his site, and he requested that either no fence be included there or that it not exceed three feet in height. Staff would agree to support either condition. In addition, Mr. Iserson stated that staff has prepared a negative declaration for the project and feels that -- there would be no adverse effects on the environment. In conclusion, staff feels the project is very well designed and will provide a very attractive statement to the Downtown entrance. Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B", with the exception to delete Condition No. 8, modify Condition No. 12.c. to either delete the fence behind the parking lot or reduce it to three feet in height, and add a new condition that would allow staff to work with the applicant on the final design of the second-story windows. Commissioner Barker feels that having 40% compact parking stalls is too high of a ratio. Mr. Iserson noted that 40% is what is allowed under the code. She noted that she has heard a lot of complaints from people about the compact parking spaces at businesses. She also expressed concern with the deficient parking on the property. Commissioner Dove stated that he regrets but understands the reason for prohibiting the left turn onto Stanley Boulevard. However, he did not note any discussion regarding the entrance on Vervais Drive. He asked what would happen when you come across from Del Valle Parkway or if you want to exit there and make a left turn. Mr. Iserson said that would be allowed. Commission Wright asked whether the signage would be on the Main Street elevation. Mr. Iserson stated that most likely there would be one in that area, one by the ATM's, and one on the building. There would be signs for the other tenants as well. He noted that staff is continuing to work with the applicant on the signage concept. Planning Commission Page 22 April 8, 1998