Laserfiche WebLink
Include a condition requiring the applicant to add one additional parking space in the middle of <br />the site and to make every attempt possible to add one parking space in the hammerhead. <br />Commissioner Dove stated that when the road improvements are made, the City should experiment with <br />using resident parking permits for this neighborhood. He also suggested that each of the four units be <br />assigned three parking spaces, in addition to their garage; however, they should make those spaces <br />available for guests. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Bazker, Dove, Kumazan, and Wright, and Chair Cooper <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. PC-98-17 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Wright, recommending <br />that the City Council review the downtown parking problems and consider ways to remedy them, <br />including issuing parking permits for residents. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Barker, Dove, Kumaran, and Wright, and Chair Cooper <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. PC-98-18 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />c. RZ-97-07, Citv of Pleasanton <br />Application to amend the Pleasanton Municipal Code to establish requirements for personal <br />wireless service facilities throughout the City. The proposed Municipal Code changes would <br />establish a minimum setback between personal wireless service facilities and the following land <br />uses: residences in residential and agricultural districts, parks, public schools, private schools, <br />nursery schools, child care centers, senior care facilities, and nursing homes. The proposed <br />Municipal Code changes would also establish design, locational and processing standards for <br />existing and proposed personal wireless services facilities. <br />Robin Eisenwinter, Assistant Planner presented the staff report and provided a history of the application. <br />She stated since the issue of wireless communications services is controversial, staff formed a group of <br />18 people comprised of residents, community business representatives, and wireless carriers to study the <br />community's and the industry's concerns regazding wireless communications facilities. She noted that <br />during October, 1997 through February, 1998, the group met five times to study the issue. At their final <br />meeting, the group reached a compromise on the items that should and should not be included in the <br />proposed draft ordinance. <br />Planning Commission Page 7 March 25, 1998 <br />