My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/24/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 03/24/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:58:48 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 9:07:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/24/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
03/24/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
towazd residents, and he does not support having property owners of industrial property excluded. The <br />committee content should be on a volunteer basis. If there is anover-flooding of people who wish to <br />serve on the committee, Mr. Pugh stated that those in the most affected areas should dominate. Mr. <br />Pugh also suggested that consultation work be placed on the WEB site. <br />Cazole Varela, 3858 Mohr Avenue, stated that the General Plan did not have a facilitator and that <br />worked well, except that she is not happy with the outcome. She noted that she lives in the area, and <br />would like to be on the committee. She commented that the Ad Hoc Committee was composed of more <br />than 80% neighbors and she feels it failed miserably. She noted that the referendum shows that they <br />were in disagreement with he Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation as well as the City. She stated that <br />those she has spoken to who are familiar with having a facilitator from the City or paid consultants have <br />not been satisfied because the feeling is that the residents have lost the trust in the system. She noted <br />that the application process should be used to form the committee. She stated that the Busch property, <br />Staples Ranch property, and potential traffic issues need to be reviewed in the study. She noted that <br />Kaiser is not interested in development, but the 1996 General Plan cleazly shows this property as light <br />industrial, with the chain of lakes, and a park. She commented that if there is potential for development <br />of this area it needs to be in the study. She doesn't want the committee to be weighted 80% <br />residents/20% special interest. A different method that will give satisfaction to the residents is needed. <br />She voiced support for the proposal made by Stan Erickson this evening. (A copy of Ms. Varela's <br />comments made at the Apri18, 1998 Planning Commission meeting regarding these minutes is <br />attached.) <br />Tom Gill, 4550 Muirwood Drive, stated that the issue comes down to customer satisfaction. He feels a <br />large percentage of City residents are not satisfied customers. He commented that the mind set of all <br />-' stakeholders within Pleasanton is changing, and that the amount of developable land is shrinking. He <br />noted that residents are seeing the effects of the growth, the overcrowded schools, and the development <br />that is going to go in which will affect their properties. He noted that he supports Stan Erickson's <br />proposal and that the study should be a change and review of the General Plan. <br />Susan Horne, 2569 Wilde Avenue, stated that she hopes that the study that is proposed would take into <br />consideration the unsafe, low-flying aircraft over the area. She stated that she is puzzled that Mohr <br />Elementary School was built in the take-off and landing path of aircraft using the Livermore Airport. <br />She hopes that whatever is proposed will not be adversely affected by these low- flying aircrafrs. <br />Judy Symcox, 1450 Groth, stated that she lives in Danbury Pazk. She noted that her interest is that <br />section of Valley Avenue between Busch Road and Santa Rita Road. She stated that when she moved to <br />Pleasanton 24 yeazs ago, she knew there would be an eastern cut-through plan. But when she purchased <br />her home in Danbury Park 13 years ago she didn't know Valley would be going through and would be <br />the only eastern connection. She stated that the way the General Plan is now, Stoneridge is suppose to <br />go east. She cited several sections of the "Arterial Cut-Through Traffic Study." She commented that the <br />study states that traffic projections indicate that at build-out about 26,000 vehicles per day will use <br />Stoneridge Drive. She noted that currently this is the traffic volume on Valley Avenue east of Santa Rita <br />Road, and that this is the azea where students cross to get to Alisal School. She noted that the "Study" <br />also states that the Stoneridge Drive extension to and east of El Charro appeazs to be beneficial to the <br />transportation network in Pleasanton. Ms. Symcox stated that her concern is circulation, and the <br />- extension of Stoneridge Drive is needed to avoid bottleneck traffic, noting that we currently have a very <br />primitive road design. She stated that if there is going to be a study the traffic plan including the <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 March 24, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.