My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/11/1998
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC 02/11/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 3:58:24 PM
Creation date
10/7/2008 8:57:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/11/1998
DOCUMENT NAME
02/11/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ed Churka, 507 St. John Street, Pleasanton, advised that he is the founder of the Pleasanton Railroad <br />Association. He noted that two years ago, the community voted to have the steam train concept returned <br />to Pleasanton. He expressed his disappointment and concern because he feels the task force did not <br />address that issue in any way. In addition, he questions how the task force has been able to make plans <br />for Alameda County's transportation comdor without any input from the County. He commented that <br />the transportation corridor is his main concern. He also stated that the locations that have been identified <br />for pazking improvements have been allowed by the County to be included in the project based upon the <br />County's future rail system plans. Mr. Churka further stated that Alameda County has already approved <br />the plan for the light rail system. He also described the two phases that have been planned to incorporate <br />the system. In addition, he noted that one of their plans included constructing a loading platform, ticket <br />office, and the train storage shed between the Fire Station and Wayside Park. He commented that <br />project has not yet been reviewed by the Planning Commission because the final drawings aze not <br />complete. Mr. Churka also expressed concern with some of the proposed uses and goals of the various <br />projects in the program. Upon further questioning by members of the Commission, he provided <br />additional information relating to the steam train. <br />Gary Schwagerle, 189 W. Angela Street, Pleasanton, stated that he is a member of the Downtown <br />Association and that they recently voted unanimously to retain the creek at Wayside Pazk in its natural <br />state without covering it up. In addition, he voiced his personal disappointment that the historic steam <br />train was not included in the proposed downtown program. He feels that a steam train is a fun family <br />activity and would also attract people to downtown Pleasanton. He voiced his support for a new <br />bandstand at Wayside Pazk, but Feels the old bandstand should be preserved for alternative uses such as a <br />gazebo. With regazd to Delucchi Park, he recommends that the task force consider a water fountain or <br />other type of water park in a children's play area. <br />Mr. Schwagerle also feels that everything possible should be done to make Pleasanton a tourist <br />attraction. He feels that the steam train, and possibly a horse and carnage attraction, would attract <br />tourism into Pleasanton and, in turn, create additional revenue. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br />After a question from Commissioner Bazker, Ms. Bengtson mentioned that the Task Force thought the <br />steam train would stop at Bernal and suggested that the Commission modify a condition to address the <br />future light rail if it is decided to go beyond Bernal. A brief discussion took place relating to the <br />Regional Trail/Transportation Corridor and the link it provides to the downtown area. <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS REOPENED <br />Jim Uranwala, 4803 Del Valle Pazkway, Pleasanton, identified himself as a member of the task force. <br />He feels that most of the attractions to Pleasanton that are being proposed, especially increased tourism, <br />will affect the parking plans which have been recommended by the task force. He expressed his concern <br />that there is really no place to add additional pazking and suggested that some land along Bernal Avenue <br />be used to construct amulti-story pazking structure. In addition, he expressed concern for the safety of <br />- children around the drainage ditch. He feels that the area should be enhanced in a way that would <br />prevent children from getting into it and, at the same time, preserve the natural chazacteristic. <br />Planning Commission Page 8 February 11, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.