Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Kumazan expressed concern with the length of meeting in reviewing large projects such <br />as Ponderosa and Greenbriar. He suggested that exceptionally large projects be reviewed in two <br />meetings and asked Mr. Iserson whether he could do that in the future. A brief discussion followed <br />relating to Greenbriaz's appeal, and Mr. Iserson reported its current status. Chair Cooper also suggested <br />that future public hearings be prioritized, with the smaller, less complicated items being reviewed first. <br />A brief discussion took place regazding this issue as well. <br />Commissioner Kumaran expressed a need for the Commission to discuss the growth management <br />process and suggested that a workshop be held prior to the upcoming meeting. Ms. Iserson stated that he <br />will discuss the recommendation with Brian Swift, since he will probably want to conduct such a <br />workshop. He will report back to the Commission on this topic. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br />a. Future Planning Calendaz <br />The Future Planning Calendar was briefly reviewed. Mr. Iserson stated that Wayne Rasmussen <br />would like the Commission to review the Happy Valley EIR and give their comments, and asked <br />whether it could be placed on the March 11 agenda. He noted that the EIR covers the golf course. Mr. <br />Higdon offered to present the golf course plan at a future meeting for informational purposes. He also <br />stated that after the EIR is reviewed, the PUD for the golf course will be complete, and it will be ready <br />to come before the Commission. The Commission agreed to review the Happy Valley EIR at the <br />March 11 meeting if that meeting agenda is not too heavy. Mr. Iserson stated that if, for that reason, it <br />could not be put on that agenda, a special meeting will be scheduled. <br />Mr. Iserson reported that Mika's has been turned over to Code Enforcement. Staff will send one more <br />letter encouraging compliance. However, if the owner continues to ignore the conditions, it will be <br />ordered to appeaz before the Commission for possible modification or revocation of the use permit. <br />b. Actions of the Citv Council <br />There were none. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />There were none. <br />9. COMMUNICATIONS <br />There were none. <br />10. REFERRALS <br />There were none. <br />11. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S INFORMATION <br />There were none. <br />Planning Commission Page 11 January 28, 1998 <br />