My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
091608
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2008 4:39:32 PM
Creation date
9/9/2008 4:39:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Neighborhood Tra ffic Calming Program <br />One of the most sensitive topics faced by transportation professionals is traffic on neighborhood streets. <br />What the public finds satisfactory on major thoroughfares is quite different than what is acceptable for a <br />local street lined by residences. While a major arterial is intended to serve primarily thru-traffic, the primary <br />function of local residential streets is to provide access to the abutting properties. However, in reality, as the <br />major thoroughfares become overloaded, thru-traffic frequently spills onto neighborhood streets, causing <br />unacceptably high traffic volumes and speeds. It is under these circumstances that neighborhood traffic <br />studies are typically initiated. <br />The first task in any neighborhood traffic study is to define the problem. The most common resident <br />concerns are: high traffic volumes, high speeds, safety, and difficult access to/from driveways. After <br />concerns are defined, a data collection program is used to quantify the problem. Typical data collection <br />tasks include: manual traffic counts, mechanical tube counts (to record volume and/or speed), spot speed <br />surveys using radar, license plate studies (where cars entering and leaving the study area are tracked), and <br />origin-destination surveys. Based upon the information collected, various neighborhood traffic control <br />techniques may be proposed. Some of the easiest and least costly neighborhood traffic control techniques <br />include the installation of signs prohibiting certain turn movements, photo radar, pavement markings, and <br />speed bumps/humps. Other more costly measures of addressing neighborhood traffic issues include the <br />installation of traffic circles, chokers, diverters, median barriers and sometimes even street closures. Public <br />involvement is key in the selection of traffic control techniques that are both effective and acceptable to the <br />neighborhood. <br />Hexagon staff has been retained by the Cities of San Jose, Cupertino, and Sunnyvale to investigate <br />neighborhood traffic problems and evaluate the effectiveness and cost of potential traffic control measures. <br />Hexagon has also worked with Saratoga residents to solve neighborhood traffic problems in a creative and <br />cooperative way. While residents traffic concerns are often narrow in scope, Hexagon also investigated City <br />staff concerns regarding the potential impacts of proposed traffic control measures on the adjacent <br />roadways. Some representative projects are described below. <br />Hexagon Neighborhood Traffic Calming Project Examples <br />San Mateo Traffic Calming Policy <br />c San Mateo, California <br />Hexagon was retained by the City of San Mateo to develop a traffic calming policy. This included the <br />production of a traffic calming policy and procedures document as well as a public outreach effort to <br />~ educate the city's residents. The policy document entailed the following: identifying the streets eligible for <br />3 traffic calming, classifying the traffic calming devices, developing criteria for the application of the devices, <br />~ and the outlining a process for conducting traffic calming studies. This policy document was presented to <br />various neighborhood groups and city commissioners for input and acted on by the San Mateo City Council. <br />N <br />C <br />~= Gary Heap <br />m City of San Mateo <br />X (650)522-7307 <br />_ 520,000 <br />Brett Walinski <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.