My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
HACIENDA REPORT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
082708 Hacienda
>
HACIENDA REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2008 3:24:47 PM
Creation date
8/19/2008 3:22:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/27/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
HACIENDA REPORT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MORRI30N I FOERSTER <br />Mayor Jennifer Hosterman and Members of the Pleasanton City Council <br />August 13, 2008 <br />Page Two <br />Hacienda is more than 90% developed today, based on a ratio of vacant land in relation to <br />Hacienda's total acreage. However, Hacienda in general and the Corporate Campus in <br />particular currently are underutilized, creating an opportunity to advance the sustainable <br />development and energy efficient goals and policies of the Draft General Plan Update <br />("GPU") Land Use Element. To date, the Corporate Campus has been used primarily for a <br />single purpose (i.e., office uses). It would now become amixed-use site that also includes <br />hotel and retail uses. While the owners of the Corporate Campus support new residential <br />growth within Hacienda, the Corporate Campus does not propose any residential uses on this <br />site. However, the new office, hotel, and retail uses would be compatible with denser <br />residential uses on other Hacienda properties proximate to the BART station. Other <br />communities have actually implemented their TOD visions near their BART stations or <br />within older conventional business parks. Hacienda is eager to actually realize your vision <br />for Hacienda, not risk losing jobs and momentum by unnecessary and burdensome planning <br />efforts. <br />A PUD Modification Would Be Mare Appropriate for Hacienda than a Specific Plan. <br />We believe that it would be more appropriate for the Corporate Campus, BRE, and WP <br />Carey project applications to be processed through modification of the existing PUD <br />approval for Hacienda, ratherthan aspart of aHacienda-wide Specific Plan, for several <br />reasons. <br />A. The GPU Already Provides a Vision and Guidance for Transit-Oriented, <br />Mixed Use Protects Equivalent to What a Specific Plan Would Provide <br />A PUD Modification is simply a better fit for an existing business park, particularly given <br />that the new GPU will set forth the City Council's new smart-growth vision for mixed-use <br />infill and transit-oriented development. All proposed projects within Hacienda will need to <br />be consistent with the new GPU as well as the PUD Modification. <br />The Draft GPU Land Use Element already provides strong guidance as to the character of <br />future development within Hacienda by encouraging the related concepts of smart growth, <br />transit-oriented development, and mixed-use development, as the following examples <br />indicate: <br />• The Land Use Element explains on page 2-20 that smart growth "encourage[es] more <br />compact, mixed-use development within existing urban areas" and facilitates the <br />access of local services such as retail through alternative modes of travel. <br />• The GPU's Mixed-Use designation "allows any combination of business park, office, <br />retail, community facilities, research and development, and residential uses ... on a <br />wc-138373 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.