My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 85144
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RES 85144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2012 12:43:27 PM
Creation date
12/22/1999 11:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/26/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert L. Warnick -2- February 1, 1985 <br /> <br /> ( <br /> ~lonitoring facilities have already been installed at Hopyard <br /> Road/Owens Drive, and the set-up for the intersection is expected to <br /> be completed in January, 1985. Both the intersections of Santa Rita <br /> Road/Stoneridge Drive and West Las Positas Boulevard/Stoneridge <br /> Drive will be modified in the near term when Stoneridge Drive is <br /> extended, and the monitoring set-up ~ill be installed with those <br /> modifications. Signals at Santa Rita Road/Pimlico Drive are under <br /> partial jurisdiction of the State, and the current signal controller <br /> at the intersection (Caltrans Type 170) is not compatible with the <br /> Multisonics VMS-220 system. A new Multisonics 870 controller could <br /> be installed to replace the existing controller, if the 870 <br /> controllers work well for the upcoming signals at the Hopyard <br /> Road/I-580 interchange. The signals at Stoneridge Drive/Springdale <br /> Avenue will not be connected with the system master until the <br /> interconnect over the Stoneridge overpass is completed. Upgrading <br /> of the signals at Stoneridge Drive/Springdale Avenue will be done as <br /> part of the planned improvements for Stoneridge Drive west of 1-680. <br /> The loop modification at the intersection of Foothill and Canyon has <br /> already been completed in anticipation of a City prb'ject to connect <br /> this intersection with the master in the near future. <br /> <br /> Counting Method <br /> <br /> Additional vehicle sensor units, detector lead-in cables, and <br />~ ( .supplemental intersection control units ISICU's)are required in <br /> '. order to count separate turning movements at an intersection. The <br /> use of a separate set of detector loop and vehicle sensor for each <br /> traffic lane used by the major ("critical") traffic movements can <br /> produce independent counting of vehicles in adjacent lanes and, <br /> hence, achieve dependable counting accuracy. It should be noted <br /> that the counting set-up would not produce counts of traffic <br /> movements other than the "critical" ones. Supplemental intersection <br /> control units are needed because the number of separate sampling <br /> detectors a current signal controller can handle is generally <br /> limited to 8, which is insufficient for counting vehicle turning <br /> movements at some major cross intersections. An SICU alone can <br /> accommodate up to 16 sampling detectors. A total of 23 SICU's are <br /> needed for the 33 recommended locations. <br /> <br /> Required hardware for monitoring should be installed with the <br /> upgrading of existing signal installations or with the construction <br /> of future signal installations. The amount of additional hardware <br /> required at the nine intersections recommended for immediate action <br /> are: <br /> <br /> 110 Vehicle sensor units, <br /> 9 SICU's, and <br /> 31,800 Feet of additional detector lead-in cable and rewiring of <br /> 110 Existing detector loops to connect to new sensors. <br /> <br /> ( <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.