My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
26 ATTACHMENTS (B)
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
081908
>
26 ATTACHMENTS (B)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2008 1:19:06 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 4:52:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/19/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
26 ATTACHMENTS (B)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development for the Berlogar lots (Lots 11-19) did not condition the project to modify the <br />FAR calculation method, but did identify in the Silver Oaks Estates Subdivision, Site <br />Development and Architectural Review Guidelines, Phase I, a different calculation <br />method (pgs 7-8). This method would be carried through to the request made by the <br />Chrismans in that the same design guidelines are being requested to implement the <br />Phase II of this previously approved planned unit development and tract map. These <br />are: <br />o To exempt up to 600 square feet of garage area from the FAR calculation <br />(the same amount for Berlogar's PUD modification); garage floor are <br />exceeding 600 square feet would be included in the FAR calculation; <br />o To include floor area where the finished ceiling height is greater than <br />fourteen (14) feet at two times the actual floor area, except for one-story <br />buildings; and, <br />o To include covered porches that are not open 85% on at least two sides. <br />These changes reflect the types of conditions normally implemented in design <br />guidelines for other planned unit development projects. Staff believes these requests <br />are consistent with Ordinance No. 1927, the Berlogar PUD modification, and will <br />continue to provide consistency and uniformity within the two phases of development. <br />These modifications to the floor area ratio calculation method can be implemented <br />because the project is a planned unit development, which allows the Planning <br />Commission and the City Council discretion to consider these types of changes. Staff <br />notes that PUDs routinely modify the Code definition of FAR, particularly relating to <br />garages, to fit the situation. <br />2. PUD-05 Approved Home Sizes (Agperson Ridae. Centex <br />The Planning Commission expressed concern with the originally approved home sizes <br />and how that related to the proposed modification that would allow for an FAR of 40%. <br />It felt that this FAR may allow for homes that would be considerably larger than the <br />approved production homes which could impact the character of the surrounding area. <br />The following table shows the PUD approved production home size for each lot. The <br />original approval for PUD-05 did not provide an FAR or limit the house size because the <br />approval was for production housing based on setbacks, etc. However, for comparison <br />purposes, staff has prepared two tables depicting the original approvals (Table 1) and <br />also has prepared two FARs that show how the calculation changes with and without a <br />garage exemption. In Table 2, one of the calculations includes the overall building area <br />(house, garage and second unit), and the other includes only the house and garage. <br />The lot sizes for the 10 home sites on the Chrisman site have been provided by RJA, <br />Civil Engineer for the project. <br />Case No. PUD-OS-02M S Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.