My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 MINUTES REGULAR 07-15-08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
081908
>
01 MINUTES REGULAR 07-15-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 3:10:48 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 3:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/19/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01 MINUTES 07-15-08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />BREAK: Mayor Hosterman called for afive-minute break at 8:45 p.m. and thereafter <br />reconvened the regular meeting. <br />17. Adopt a resolution placing an initiative measure to protect ridgelines and hillsides and to <br />clarify growth management procedures on the November 4, 2008 ballot; and approve <br />related election procedures <br />Assistant City Attorney Seto gave the staff report, stating the Council gave direction at its June <br />26~' meeting for staff to return with a proposed ballot measure regarding hillsides, ridgelines, <br />and clarifying growth management issues. The Council gave direction this should embody <br />several different items the Council can review, that the measure include a collaborative and <br />public process to include potentially different stakeholders in a process to develop future <br />ordinances and guidelines; that the ordinance would protect critical ridges, hillsides particularly <br />in the south and east hills area, and that there be an engineering basis for these new <br />regulations, including looking at new issues such as view lines, geotechnical information, <br />elevations and other types of data. Council also directed this measure re-affirm existing General <br />Plan policies with regards to ridgelines and hillsides, and also preserve the growth management <br />cap while clarifying issues regarding growth management and housing units. Also, that there <br />should be a deadline to complete this process to have the new ordinance in place through the <br />collaborative and public process and that this measure would be an alternative measure to the <br />Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap Initiative. And, as an alternative measure it would mean <br />that if this measure received more votes, this measure would prevail and the other would not be <br />enacted. <br />The Council would need to take action on the text, the title and the ballot question, make a <br />decision on whether the Council would participate and how they would participate in ballot <br />arguments, and then adopt the resolution placing the matter on the ballot that would incorporate <br />all of those decisions. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne questioned and confirmed that if the Council chose to put a deadline on the <br />draft ordinance, it could be earlier than November 2009. Councilmember McGovern confirmed <br />with the City Manager that an environmental study would be done if the draft ordinance is <br />completed and that it could be a negative declaration or a full EIR and the Initiative talks about <br />the ordinance or guidelines being completed by November 2009 so it could go into 2010 with <br />the EIR. Conversely, the timeline can be shortened and the Council can request the process be <br />completed within 6-8 months. <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to the ordinance, discussed a collaborative and public <br />process, and indicated it could be a citizen's or stake holder's committee who works and <br />develops recommendations to the Council or provide a public hearing where everyone gets an <br />opportunity for public comment. City Manager Fialho said it is open-ended because the Council <br />was not specific in terms of its direction. Assuming the measure is approved in November staff <br />would return to the Council and receive specific direction. <br />Councilmember Sullivan referred to the housing cap definition. He questioned whether or not on <br />the CLC project, some formula would be developed at some point and not in advance of voting <br />on the initiative, but at a later time when assisted living facilities would be determined. City <br />Attorney Roush said the language is to address situations such as the community care facility <br />City Council Minutes 8 July 15, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.