Laserfiche WebLink
Staff arrived at three options: 1) the establishment of a commission on the environment which is <br />traditional to what is in place in the City by City ordinance, which include 5 members and 1 <br />alternate, appointed by the Mayor and ratified by the Council. This structure provides a <br />continuous advocacy for environmental sustainability; 2) the establishment of a task force <br />comprised of community members, outside experts, and City staff. The advantage of the task <br />force is that the depth of representation is more than 5 members, ranging in size from 10-20 <br />people. A designated timeframe is issued by the Council which provides opportunities for <br />focused outcomes. A variation of that is the standing committee option, such as the Economic <br />Vitality Commission and the Youth Master Plan Implementation Committee; 3) establishment of <br />a subcommittee made up of two Councilmembers, two Planning Commissioners, and extended <br />to include other standing commissions, and would fall under Brown Act requirement as an Ad <br />Hoc Committee. <br />He said staff identified 5 issues; 1) strive for the broadest representation possible from all <br />sectors of the community; 2) maximize expertise; 3) leverage existing staff resources; 4) ensure <br />the advisory body not conflict with the approved work plans of staff, Council or existing <br />commissions, which could be managed through the annual goal setting retreat and joint <br />workshop with the advisory body, and that it not conflict with the Planning Commission's roles <br />and responsibilities; and 5) encourage the advisory body serve as a convener of community <br />ideas. <br />After receiving Council direction tonight, staff will return at a subsequent meeting with an <br />enabling ordinance or resolution. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned if staff has any recommendation on the options, and Mr. <br />Fialho said staff has developed the 5 issues the Council should be mindful of, the fewer number <br />of people the better, that you establish specific timelines and a focus, it is important to establish <br />a work plan, and establish a timeline to complete a work plan, that the council track the <br />performance and the Council be provided an opportunity to continue with the work plan or be <br />provided with flexibility and the opportunity to disband that commission or task force if <br />necessary. <br />Councilmember McGovern said having worked on the original Youth Master Plan <br />Implementation Committee, one part of the work plan was to develop a strategic plan, and she <br />asked if this would be done. Mr. Fialho said his preference would be a hybrid between 1 and 2; <br />five members and a maximum of 6 members for Item 1, and he likes Item 2 being specific in <br />terms of charge and responsibility and how that gets defined by way of an ordinance or <br />resolution. <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio confirmed with the City Manager that if the Council started out with <br />5-6 members and put a definite timeline to achieve something, there is nothing to stop the <br />Council from altering it depending on needs. <br />Mayor Hosterman opened the item for public comment. <br />Tim Belcher said it was interesting in the report that there were 15 programs, 12 different water <br />conservation initiatives listed, yet the list was rather small. He felt 5 people would be too few to <br />represent all of the constituencies and the different disciplines and suggested rather a 7 <br />member committee. He also suggested task forces be contained with the committee, as <br />needed, and agreed to help. <br />Mayor Hosterman closed public comment. <br />City Council Minutes 17 July 15, 2008 <br />