My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
081908
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2008 2:58:08 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/19/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br />In 1983, the City Council adopted a comprehensive records management program and <br />retention schedule that is applied to all City records. The retention schedule reflects the <br />length of time a file is active and retained in City offices, the amount of time that a file is <br />retained off site in an inactive status and the time line and procedures for document <br />destruction. From time to time the City Council amends the records management <br />system and retention schedule to more accurately reflect changes in state retention <br />laws, City ordinance, department needs and City Council policy. <br />As part of staffs ongoing records management monitoring, it has been determined that <br />it is advisable and necessary, to amend the retention schedule for Police Department <br />records. This change will not amend how records are accessed or their availability to <br />the public and staff but rather, the retention timelines. In general, the retention schedule <br />is being reduced to be consistent with State law and the City records management <br />policy for other City records. Attachment 2 reflects the recommended changes. Upon <br />approval, staff will make the changes necessary to conform to these changes. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The recommended resolution recommending a change to the existing records retention <br />schedule is included as Attachment 1. As noted, a total of nine categories out of the <br />total of 48 categories are recommended for change. The recommended changes will <br />not impact City operations and are consistent with State records management law. <br />Submitted by: Approve by: <br />(~1~ ~/I <br />Karen Dia~ Nelson Fialh <br />City Clerk ~ ' City Manager <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.