RES 86445 - Laserfiche WebLink

c.10. Finding. Adoption of the Final General Plan will not change the level of development impact and will further protect the visual resource of Pleasanton Ridge. c.ll. Fact. Additional units will be allowed, but they will be clustered on the more level, less visible, portions of the Ridge. c.12. Findinq. The MDA would substantially increase the potential impacts. c.13. Fact. Under the MDA, Rural Density Residential would be allowed on parcels above 670 feet elevation, which would add approximately 660 units to the holding capacity. c.14. Fact. Increased densities would be allowed on several major parcels which would require more substantial road systems and be much more difficult to "blend" into the landscape. D. Significant Effect. Land use proposed for 1,152 acres of land on Pleasanton Ridge is inconsistent with the use planned by the owner of the land, the East Bay Regional Park District. d.1. Finding. The City will remedy inconsistencies between the General Plan and the East Bay Regional Park District's Plan. d.2. Fact. The City has appointed a liaison committee to work with the Park District to remedy inconsistencies. d.3. Finding. The City's land use designation of "Public Health and Safety" is an adequate holding zone for land not yet owned by the Park District. d.4. Fact. The Public Health and Safety designation prohibits development except for single family houses on lots of record. E. Significant Effect. Land use proposed for a 77 acre parcel of land, Medium Density Residential and Public and Institutional, is inconsistent with the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology's designation of the land as an area containing significant deposits of aggregate resource. e.1. Finding. The impact can only be mitigated by redesignating the property to a sand and gravel harvesting land use, a land use determined to be infeasible.