My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
071508
>
10 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2008 4:40:10 PM
Creation date
7/9/2008 4:40:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />VldonThot iNow~`Y'fwr Cornmunit~ <br />Transportation <br />Consultants <br />Pleasanton <br />3875 Hopyard Road <br />Suite 200 <br />Pleasanton, CA <br />94588-8526 <br />925.463.061 I <br />925.463.3690 fax <br />Fresno <br />516 W.Shaw Avenue <br />Suite 200 <br />Fresno, CA <br />93704-2515 <br />559.325.7530 <br />559.221.4940 fax <br />Sacramento <br />980 Ninth Street <br />16'^ Floor <br />Sacramento, CA <br />95814-2736 <br />916.449.9095 <br />Santa Rosa <br />141 Stony Circle <br />Suite 280 <br />Santa Rosa, CA <br />95401-4110 <br />707.575.5800 <br />707.575.5888 fax <br />May 23, 2008 <br />Mr. Joshua H. Pack, P.E. <br />Senior Transportation Engineer <br />City of Pleasanton <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />Subject: Updated Cost Proposal for Traffic Development Impact Fee Study <br />Dear Mr. Pack: <br />Following our interview and subsequent conversations earlier this week, TJKM has prepared an <br />updated budget reflecting a modified approach to the cost estimating portion of the project. <br />Under our modified approach, we will prepare aone-page fact sheet for each project to be <br />included in the TDIF. This fact sheet will describe the project, the need/justification for the <br />project, the cost of the project, funding breakdown information and a sketch or photo clearly <br />portraying the project. The City and TJKM may also decide to add other information on the fact <br />sheet. <br />On some projects, a more detailed project investigation and drawing will be in prepared in <br />addition to the fact sheet. In our proposal we included an I Ixl7 sample drawing of a project in <br />Livermore. We anticipate this level of detail would be included on up to 15 projects for the <br />Pleasanton TDIF. In our original proposal we anticipated this expanded level of detail on an <br />estimated 40 projects. <br />This revised approach reduces our costs significantly. I have enclosed a revised budget spread <br />sheet that reduces our cost proposal to $ 15 I ,860 from our original cost of $2 13,716. The cost <br />reductions are for Mark Thomas and Company personnel; costs for TJKM and Peter MacDonald <br />personnel are unchanged from the original proposal. <br />We completely support this new approach and feel it will result in awell-documented report. <br />Please contact me if there are any questions on this. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Chris D. Kinzel, P.E. <br />President <br />Attachment: Updated Budget <br />\Pleasanton\Proposals\2008\TDIF\L052308 Updated Budget.doc <br />[jkrn@tjkrn.com <br />www.[jkm.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.