1961 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 1961 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR MEYER PROPERTIES, INC. AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-80-16. WHEREAS, application of Meyer Properties, Inc. for planned unit development (Industrial and Commercial) zoning and development plan approval for an approximately 82 acre site located at the northwest corner of Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive. The tentative proposal for land uses for the subject area indicates approximately 36 acres of industrial development, 24 acres of office development and 11 acres of commercial development to be served by 11 acres of dedicated streets. As part of the office land use, one building 14 stories in height and two buildings 8 stories in height are proposed. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (General Industrial). The Planning Commission may recommend approval of the rezoning and development plan as proposed or may modify the proposal in any manner consistent with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development- General Industrial District); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 11, 1981 at which time all pertinent documents and testimony were reviewed; and WHEREAS, said proposal was based upon an Initial Study done pursuant to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures adopted by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton by Resolution No. 77-66; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of March 11, 1981 received the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration in a report from the Director of Planning and Community Development dated March 11, 1981 regardinng the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised by the City Attorney of its responsibilities in reviewing the proposed Negative Declaration and the determinations required by Section 5.4 (e) of Resolution No. 77-66; and WHEREAS, each member of the Planning Commission had before him/her copies of Resolution No. 77-66 at the time of considering the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study; and WHEREAS, the public was afforded an opportunity to comment on the _ proposed environmental assessment, which had previously been published in the Pleasanton Times, at the time of the public hearing on the aforementioned project; and