My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1984
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 2:25:21 PM
Creation date
6/26/2008 9:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/13/1981
DOCUMENT NO
1984
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-80-8
NOTES
LAND USE/CIRCULATION REV. COMM.
NOTES 2
EIR TO FORMULATE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAND USE/CIRCULATION CHANGES
NOTES 3
CITY-WIDE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHI81~ ~ <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDINGS - For Case GP-80-8 <br />1. Significant Effect: Inconsistency between land use pattern and other <br />land use and General Plan policies, population goal and percent multiple <br />dwelling units particularly. <br />Finding: A reevaluation of General Plan goals and policies or further <br />adjustments in land use acreages will mitigate this impact. <br />Facts: In light of these land use changes and the reduced size of <br />City households, the reevaluation of goals and policies relating to population, <br />density, residential mix policies or adjustment of land use acreages <br />elsewhere in the planning area will reduce the inconsistency in policies. <br />2. Significant Effect: Increase in traffic within existing developed City area. <br />Finding: Adoption of revisions to the Circulation Element of the General <br />Plan to reflect changing needs will reduce the impacts of increased <br />traffic in specific areas. <br />Facts: The incorporation into the Circulation Element of the General Plan <br />of recommendations resulting from the analysis of traffic in the north <br />Pleasanton area will reflect the needs of these areas. <br />3. Significant Effect: Potential loss of site for BART station near Stoneridge <br />Shopping Center. <br />Finding: Alternate BART station locations are being studied prior to any <br />specific actions on implementation policies. <br />Fact: The proposed amendment to the General Plan relating to the BART <br />route realignment is considered premature and should await the necessary <br />studies to be completed prior to any further actions. <br />4. Significant Effect: Location of park (Area 2) is located in an unacceptable <br />naise level area. <br />Finding: Adequate buffering measures incorporated at time of development <br />will mitigate noise impacts. <br />Facts: The adoption of the proposal contained within GP-81-2 will provide <br />for commercial and office uses to be located between the park location and <br />the Interstate 680 noise source. <br />5. Significant Effect: Placement of residential uses adjacent to potentially <br />noisy commercial and/or residential areas. <br />Finding: The adoption of measures to reduce such noise and land use <br />conflicts will mitigate this impact. <br />Facts: Development standards to be used during the design review process <br />for these critical areas shall include measures to buffer and/or to provide <br />compatibility between residential and adjacent commercial land uses. <br />6. Significant Effect: Circulation system changes would likely place <br />industrial traffic on streets adjoining residences- (Santa Rita Road and. <br />West Las Positas Boulevard) and create unacceptable noise levels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.