My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1723
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
1723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 2:54:30 PM
Creation date
6/24/2008 2:23:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/14/1979
DOCUMENT NO
1723
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-79-2
NOTES
CASTLEWOOD ENTERPRISES
NOTES 2
NEG. DEC. FOR LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE
NOTES 3
JUNIPERO DRIVE/SUNOL BLVD.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />'COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 1723 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY <br />OF PLEASANTON APPRQVING THE FILING OF A NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION FOR CA$TLEWOOD ENTERPRISES FILED UNDER <br />GP-79-2. <br />WHEREAS, Castlewood Enterprises has applied for a general plan <br />amendment to change the land use designation of a 2.5 <br />acre site located at the southeast quadrant of the <br />junction of Junipexo Drive and Sunol Boulevard from <br />"Public and InstitU~tional" to "Commercial and Offices" <br />and "High Density residential;" and <br />WHEREAS, said proposal was based upon an Initial Study done pursuant <br />to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures <br />adopted by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton <br />by Resolution No. 77-66' and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at its meeting of March 14, 1979, <br />received the Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration <br />in a report from the Director of Planning and Community <br />Development dated March. 2;-1979 regarding the afore- <br />mentioned project; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised of its responsibilities <br />in reviewing the proposed Negative Declaration and the <br />determinations required by Section 5.4 (e) of Resolution <br />No. 77-66; and <br />WHEREAS, each member of the Planning Commission. had before him/her <br />copies of Resolutign No. 77-66 at the time of considering <br />the proposed environmental assessment, which was previously <br />published in "The Times," at the time of the public hearing <br />on the aforementioned project; and <br />WHEREAS, upon receipt of thq staff report and public input, the <br />Planning Commission reviewed the provisions of the City's <br />Guidelines and Processing Procedures for the evaluation <br />of the projects anc~ the preparation of Environmental Impact <br />Reports as they pertain to requirements for Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports in order <br />to determine if a Negative Declaration is appropriate for <br />the project and what mitigation measures, if any, must be <br />undertaken to ensure that the project will not have a <br />significant impact ',upon the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.