1727 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY QF PLEASANTON COUNTS OF ALAMEDA STATE''OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION No. 1727 A RESOLUTION OF THE~PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PUD-78-1. WHEREAS, L AND H LAND COMPAN~ has filed an application for approval of a hillside planned development consisting of a 10-lot, single-fami~y residential subdivision located on a 50 acre site nprthwesterly of the existing terminus of Longview Drive; end WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the matter wherein all ',pertinent information was presented for the Commission'!~s review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the possible environmental effe~ts of the project and has found that, with the conditions of approval, there would be no significant effect;, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the PUD is in conformance with t~e General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING,COMMISSION RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1.A11 findings requi ed required by Section 2-2.3209(d), Article 32, Chapte 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasa ton are made and in particular the following in actor ante with the staff's concerns as detailed in the st ff report dated February 20, 1979: A. That the plan in that it peg of a quality ~ that it will erosion effec requirements enhance the s that existing stable geolog movement of s activity; exi the north and not sliding; in the Bissel is in the best interest of the community nits large lot low density residences ~t available elsewhere within the City; =rve to correct the potentially hazardous currently taking place; that the f conditions 2 through 11 will substantially fety and welfare of buildings and builders; conditions on the hill indicate a c condition, i.e., no evidence of ide area even during major seismic ting structures not sliding; houses to south with the same geological conditions ough grade road has not slid as indicatted and Karn testimony; and B. Adequate fire safety measures have been incorporated per condition$ 14, 15, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30. C. That the plan!is consistent with the general plan in that it is zoned properly and that the conditions d d ~m osed brings this development into require an p conformance with the growth management policy concerns and goals.