My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
1743
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
1743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 2:55:00 PM
Creation date
6/24/2008 12:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/9/1979
DOCUMENT NO
1743
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-77-10
NOTES
MISSION PARK INVESTMENT COMPANY
NOTES 2
PUD CONSTRUCTION ON 54 ACRE SITE
NOTES 3
SUNOL BLVD/MISSION DRIVE/PICO AVE.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e) That the de' <br />changes a t <br />to the Plan: <br />issuance of <br />development <br />2. That final appro <br />General Plan bei~ <br />as shown on the , <br />relo~ <br />irou~ <br />zing <br />any <br />val ~ <br />ig a~ <br />3tta~ <br />~ment plan modified to show <br />3h d above shall be submitted <br />Division for approval prior to <br />building permits for the subject <br />~f this case is conditioned upon the <br />vended to show Mission Hill Park <br />:hed development plan. <br />3. That the exterio de ign of all custom homes in the <br />development shal be subject to final approval by <br />the Planning Div sio prior to issuance of buildings <br />permits and all rod ction homes approved by the <br />Planning Commiss on. <br />4. That all fences nd ccessory structures visible beyond <br />the boundaries o th subject property shall be subject <br />to design approv 1 b the Planning Division and that <br />this condition s all be part of the CC&Rs of the <br />development. <br />5. That where visib <br />development, the: <br />between the rear <br />property line an. <br />of the CC&Rs of <br />6. That any top soi. <br />replaced prior t~ <br />in which the top <br />7. That an erosion <br />approved by the ~ <br />for the subdivis <br />e b <br />e s] <br />of <br />th <br />he <br />rep <br />oa <br />soi. <br />ont: <br />ity <br />on. <br />yond the boundaries of the <br />all be no accessory structures <br />he main structure and the rear <br />t this condition shall be part <br />evelopment. <br />owed during the grading process be <br />upancy of homes in the general area <br />was removed. <br />of plan be submitted to and <br />as part of the improvement plan <br />8. That a dust cont of lan be submitted to and approved <br />by the City prio to the beginning of grading. <br />9. That there shall be ccess for emergency vehicles to <br />all open space a eas shown on the development plan. <br />10. That a lot speci is eologic investigation shall be <br />undertaken for e ch of where structures are planned <br />within 30 ft. of a s ope where the natural grade <br />exceeded 15$ for any lot which is on fill; and for <br />any other lot wh re uch an investigation is deemed <br />necessary by the Chi f Building Inspector or City <br />Engineer; these nve tigations shall certify the <br />existence of a b ild ng site on each lot examined. <br />Investigation sh 11 e done by a state licensed <br />geologist or geo ogi engineer and shall be completed <br />prior to filing fi al map on the subject property. <br />11. That should any rop sed lot not prove to be buildable, <br />such lot shall n t b shown on the tentative map as a <br />separate parcel, but shall be included in the open <br />space lands or a ded to neighboring parcels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.