Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Sullivan thanked the Task Force for their work, said he was surprised when he <br />saw the larger conceptual plan, did not want to lock into the plan without reviewing all options, <br />he asked to see some two-story options and some reduced number options for the site, as this <br />will be a significant change to the neighborhood. He also wanted to better understand the <br />relationship between Pleasanton Gardens and how the City leverages its assets and what <br />happens to the ownership of the site if the development happens. Another option he wanted to <br />look at is whether the City should redevelop both sites and spreading the units out across the <br />two sites in a less dense fashion. Regarding affordability, he asked for a table with `x' number of <br />units at certain levels which he believed would most likely come out of the pro forma. Also, he <br />asked for a comparison of rehabilitating the existing buildings versus building new buildings. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne agreed with the additional options proposed, but said the Task Force <br />realizes these are the beginning stages and there are a lot of pitfalls they will need to deal with <br />such as parking, view lines, height, density, financial feasibility. <br />Councilmember McGovern voiced concern with the recommendation for a proposed 150 unit <br />housing development and suggested other options. She said outdoor landscaped areas are <br />being taken up with parking lots which she feels detracts from the project, she is not looking at <br />removing Pleasanton Gardens, and financially, she suggested the Council focus on Kottinger <br />Place only without Pleasanton Gardens. Mr. Bocian said Kottinger Place operates exclusively <br />on grants from HUD and people are getting concerned about that right now, and <br />Councilmember McGovern said the Council should review those types of things from all <br />aspects, work with the surrounding neighborhoods, wanted to know the value of Kottinger <br />Place, voiced concerns with the development's financial feasibility, but is willing to move <br />forward. <br />City Manager Fialho noted that the City has experience doing this with two or three other <br />projects and confirmed with the Council that staff will analyze financially two extremes and come <br />up with 4-5 options; the 150-unit project to the least extreme which is rehabbing the existing <br />structures, including terms of affordability, pro's and con's of several options which can be done <br />through a pro forma. The secondary part of the recommendation is to begin to provide some <br />conceptual designs for the 150-unit project, which may lead to additional conceptual work on the <br />other options when staff returns to Council. <br />Motion: It was m/s by Cook-Kallio//Thorne to approve conceptual site plan for the <br />redevelopment of Kottinger Place and authorized the Task Force to work toward developing a <br />final project plan including a draft financial pro-forma and ownership structure for the proposed <br />150-unit senior housing development; approved amendment #1 to the professional services <br />agreement with Christian Church Homes for an amount not to exceed $35,000 for additional <br />architectural design and administrative services. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />COUNCIL REPORTS: Brief reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the <br />Mayor and City Council -None. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL <br />