My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENTS 03 TO 07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
061008
>
06 ATTACHMENTS 03 TO 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2008 3:53:29 PM
Creation date
6/4/2008 3:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
06 ATTACHMENT 03 TO 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A question of whether the detention basin would remain green or become a lake was raised by <br />Commissioner Pentin. Mr. Wolfe indicated that it would not become a lake, since the basin water is <br />pretreated and piped into the Arroyo Mocho. Mr. Ferber indicated that some fencing around this area may <br />be required, perhaps with a gate control; however, at this time, additional information needs to be obtained <br />regarding usability of the area. <br />Commissioner Pentin felt strongly that an additional restroom was needed in the design. He also <br />wondered how sports groups will be served now that sports fields have been removed from the proposed <br />Master Plan. Mr. Wolfe suggested Commissioners review documentation in their packages that had been <br />received from the sports groups regarding the desire for improvements to Upper Bernal Field and sports <br />fields in Phase II of Bernal Community Park. <br />Commissioner Dibiase had concerns regarding the possibility of people driving up to the group picnic <br />area, due to its close proximity to parking spaces. He also noted that the workshops indicated some <br />interest in a water feature in the park, but none appeared on the proposal plan. Mr. Ferber indicated that a <br />moderate amount of interest had been shown; however, something could be incorporated in the play area <br />similar to what has been done at Val Vista Community Park. Mr. Wolfe noted that the Civic Arts <br />Commission has received interest from the community for a water element, so something could be <br />suggested by that Commission for the park. <br />Commissioner Kinzer agreed with comments from other Commissioners, and was also concerned that <br />parking area #22 would be used more by people going to the ice facility. <br />Commissioner Ritter agreed with Commissioner Pentin that an additional restroom was needed in the <br />design. He discussed the location of the ice facility and access points into the park, and was concerned <br />about traffic on Stoneridge Drive for special events at the ice facility. Mr. Wolfe indicated that just as <br />with special events at the Aquatic Center, the City would work with the operators on parking plans, etc. <br />for special events at the ice facility. <br />Commissioner Ellgas agreed with the concerns expressed, and the need for additional restrooms. She also <br />discussed the differences between neighborhood and community parks, and was advised that restrooms <br />are generally not included in neighborhood parks. <br />Mr. Ferber further discussed with the Commission the pedestrian circulation of the park design. He <br />advised that people attending the workshops had expressed a desire to be able to stroll and walk around <br />the park, and that the design presented best met the desires of those that attended. <br />Chairperson Kummer opened the Public Hearing at 8:30 p.m. <br />Don Gralnek, San Jose Sharks -indicated he has been a part of the group working for the past several <br />years trying to get an ice skating facility in Pleasanton that would be for all members of the community. <br />He thanked the community for its involvement in the workshops, and believes there was a good balance of <br />park activities considered. Until the park design is approved, his organization has not moved forward with <br />any discussions on what funds will be contributed towards park improvements. If the ice skating facility <br />is approved in the design, the organization will move forward with PUD plans and whatever City <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />April 10, 2008 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.