18 ATTACHMENT 5 - Laserfiche WebLink

The applicants have proposed to install two 9-foot, 8-inches tall wood trellis style carports to provided the covered parking space for each lot. Staff feels that the provision for the covered parking is an improvement over the current situation where no covered parking is being provided for either residence. Additionally, staff feels that the informal design of a wooden trellis structure is also appropriate given the constraints of the site and the likelihood that new structures would be constructed at some point in the future. Site Development Standards The site development standards for the proposed development are outlined in the table below. Table 3.1 Main Structures Parcel A Parcel B Lot Size Min. 4,085 sq. ft. 5,161 sq. ft. Setbacks: Front Yard 20 ft. 20 ft. Rear Yard 15 ft. 15 ft. Side Yard 3 ft. minimum on the left 7 ft. minimum on both sides side and 7 ft. minimum on the right side Building Height 30 ft. 30 It Max.** FAR Max.* 40% 40% Accessory structures Parcel A Parcel B (Class I) Setbacks: Front Yard 20 lt. 20 ft. Rear Yard*** 5 ft. 5 lt. Side Yard*** 3 ft. 3 ft. Building Height 1 S ft. 15 ft. Ma~.~* * The FAR (Floor Area Ratio) excludes the access portion of Parcel B (net lot size). ** Measured from the lowest finished grade to the highest ridge point, including all chimney projections. *** Setbacks are measured to the wall and eaves may encroach 1/3 into the setback area per the Building Code. Class II Accessory Structures follow the R-1-6,500 zoning standards At the time that Parcel B is redeveloped, the future design proposal is conditioned to install beige colored interlocking pavers along the access corridor. Given the historical nature of these aged structures, staff has also conditioned the future homes to provide a cost analysis of restoring the structures verses new construction to maintain the historical ties of the structures. If it is determined that the costs to retain and Item 5. a., PUD-73, Maestas and Carey Page 7 of 12 Planning Commission