Laserfiche WebLink
The table below summarizes the existing and proposed building setbacks. Building B <br />currently has an existing non-conforming rear yard setback at 25 feet where 30 feet is <br />required by code for the RM-4,000 zoning district. "I'he current positioning of the <br />existing structures will be allowed to remain, but the proposed development standards <br />will supersede the existing and resulting setbacks at the time of future development <br />occurs (renovations or new construction). <br />Table 1.1 <br /> <br />Setbacks <br />Existin <br />Resultin Future <br />Develo ment <br />Buildin A <br />Front 28' 28' 20' <br />Right <br />side <br />12' <br />12' <br />7' <br />Left side 11' 1' 3' <br />Rear 88' 16' 15' <br />Buildin B <br />Front 92' 10' 20' <br />Right <br />side <br />7' <br />7' <br />7' <br />Left side 30' 30' 7' <br />Rear 25' 25' 15' <br />ANALYSIS <br />General Plan Land Use Conformity <br />The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation, which is <br />High Density Residential (greater than eight dwelling units per gross acre). The project <br />would have a density of approximately 9 units per acre, which is within the allowed range <br />of 8 or more dwelling units per acre for HDR development. High density residential does <br />not have a midpoint density requirement. <br />Downtown Specific Plan Conformity <br />Although this parcel is not located in the Downtown Specific Plan area, it is the adjacent <br />parcel of the boundary. Therefore staff feels that it is appropriate to review this project <br />for conformity to those standards. Staff believes the current proposal is in conformance <br />with the land use designation and policies of the Downtown Specific Plan, and is <br />consistent with the pattern of approved residential development within the Downtown <br />District. <br />In 1991, PUD 91-9 was approved to divide the easterly neighboring parcel of an <br />approximately 7,359 square-foot lot into two parcels with areas of 4,053 square feet and <br />3,057 respectively, where the existing residence (945 square feet) remained and a new <br />845 square foot home was constructed on the new lot. Please see the attached Staff <br />Report and Conditions of Approval for more information (Attachment 5). <br />Item S. a., PUD-73, Maestas and Carey Page 4 of 12 Planning Commission <br />