RES 86209 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 86-209 RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF JAMES MCDOWELL FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF A PARCEL WITHOUT THE REQUIRED FRONTAGE ON APPROXIMATELY 15,500 SQ. FT. LOCATED AT 435 NEAL STREET (AP-86-03) WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 10, 1986, the Board of Adjustment made the required findings and approved the variance application of James McDowell; and WHEREAS, this decision was appealed by the City Council so that it could review the application totally; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 6, 1986, the City Council reviewed a report (SR 86:131) from the Director of Planning and Community Development together with copies of staff reports to the Board of Adjustment regarding this matter; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at which time applicant and any other member of the public was offered an opportunity to present evidence regarding this appeal; and WHEREAS, after a review of the material presented, the City Council makes the following findings: a. That because there are special circumstances having to do with the efficient utilization of the subject property, the strict application of the provisions of the Code would deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classifications. b. That because of the special circumstances mentioned in paragraph (a) above, the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning district. c. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: