14 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ ~_ X21' ~ . I i t. r.r P4n11r IP i r ~ - 1l. il.1.Y ~n. fR '..~....IR ..rw.~_ f i _ ''r y~r GeQUi* ..... ~ !' 'i ~r~r Ge0E4 TecSWrE •t1'I E%ISTNG i rrR ~~ CONCRETE '. ' ~, lR erR ~# J Porter ~ f ~ ~~`~I ~~ .r f ~~~ I -' StM1dlBG01101¢tE ~ . ,~ .,;, -~ IS~dCabl ir.z fl i 6oslrg S4pt Arap,lw Snetl (Note: See Deud) Euswp sops x Comte Renpy ~ ~ i ~. Cawte4 Remoal 9 v RESIDENCE fe "` i s~ Rin br Ga t~c Site plan illustrating the location of the pool as agreed to by both the Bessos and the Spencers Staff notes that the diagram of the pool (above) with the 10- and 5-foot setbacks is not reflected in Exhibit A. The applicant is aware that the plans submitted for issuance of a building permit shall be revised to reflect the setbacks approved by the Council. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 9, 2008 to review the subject application. Additional staff analysis regarding the project can be found in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 4), and detailed information on this meeting is provided by the attached draft excerpts of the Planning Commission meeting minutes (Attachment 5). Staff provided the Planning Commission with the following four options to consider for recommendation to the Council: Option 1: Allow the applicant to maintain their original request to reduce the required 20-foot rear yard setback to 5 feet and reduce the required side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet; Option 2: Allow the applicants to reduce the side yard setback from the required 10 feet to 5 feet; however, reduce the rear yard setback from the required 20 feet to 10 feet; Option 3: Allow the applicants to reduce the side yard setback from the required 10 feet to 5 feet; however, maintain the required 20-foot rear yard setback as established in the PUD Guidelines; or - M~f p.1,r ~ r.. ~ i :~ ~~ `. __ is ~ T ~ ' F%KTMG ~ ~ CONCRETE ~ J~T•.r ~i Page 5 of 7