My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
050608
>
17 ATTACHMENT 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:32:55 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:29:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/6/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grading_Modification <br />The applicants have proposed limited re-grading on the property to expand the flat pad yard <br />area. Staff feels that the proposed grading would not adversely affect the originally approved <br />grading of the development and would not adversely impact adjacent neighbors. Therefore, <br />staff feels that the proposed grading revisions are acceptable. A condition of approval requires <br />the applicants submit a final grading and drainage plan depicting all final grades and on-site <br />drainage systems. Drainage from the proposed improvements will be required to connect to an <br />approved point of discharge, subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer and/or the <br />Chief Building Official. <br />Relocation of Developer-Installed Trees <br />Staff believes it would be acceptable to relocate two of the developer-installed trees elsewhere <br />on the rear slope bank. Since the relocated trees were not indicated on the plans, a condition of <br />approval requires that a plan showing the tree locations be submitted for the review and <br />approval by the Planning Director. <br />VI. PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of the hearing for the appeal was mailed to those property owners and tenants within <br />1,000 feet of the subject site. Except for the neighbors' comments indicated in this report and <br />listed in the attached emails and letters of appeal, staff has not received any additional comments <br />from any of the other adjacent property owners or tenants. <br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />Projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 3, Section 15303(a), "New Construction or <br />Conversion of Small Structures," and Class 4, Section 15304, "Minor Alterations to Land." <br />Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report. <br />VIII. CONCLUSION <br />As proposed and conditioned, the proposed second unit complies with the City's Second Unit <br />Ordinance and is a permitted use on the subject property. The proposed second unit also <br />complies with the applicable site development standards in terms of setbacks, height, size, and <br />floor area. Furthermore, staff has considered the design criteria required by the Municipal Code <br />to be included in the Zoning Administrator's and Planning Commission's scope of review, such <br />as preservation of views, scale, and relationship of the building to its site and to surrounding <br />PAP-117 Planning Commission <br />Page 13 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.