My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENT 08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
050608
>
17 ATTACHMENT 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:32:55 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:29:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/6/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENT 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
used to mitigate the potential privacy impacts created by the second unit windows. These <br />include: <br />• Eliminating and/or relocating some of the windows. <br />• Reducing the size of the windows. <br />• Utilizing view-obscuring glazing. <br />• Install landscaping along the side of the second unit. <br />• "Flip" the floor plan of the second unit, which would place a single window and side <br />door facing the 2618 Ingrid Court property. <br />Staff discussed these options with the applicants and the applicants indicated that they are <br />willing to install landscape screening along the side of the second unit. The applicants indicated <br />that they are trying to maximize the natural light and sense of openness in the second unit, <br />particularly after reducing its size down to 700 square feet, and do not want to remove or reduce <br />the size of any of the windows or use view-obscuring glazing. The applicants have also <br />indicated that they do not want to "flip" the floor plan because it would disrupt the flow of the <br />second unit, which has been designed around the whole indoor/outdoor feeling going from the <br />barbeque area in and out of the second unit. Also, the applicants indicated that the bathroom <br />access is meant to be available for use by people coming in and out of the pool or lounging in <br />the barbeque area. <br />Staff believes that there would be adequate room between the second unit and northern side <br />property line to plant a dense landscape screen to obscure views out of the second unit windows <br />into the 2618 Ingrid Court home and yard areas. Therefore, staff does not believe that the side <br />windows would need to be removed, reduced in size, relocated, or contain view-obscuring <br />glazing. The landscaping would also help screen views of the second unit structure from the <br />home and yard areas of 2618 Ingrid Court, which staff feels should help lessen Mr. Chen's and <br />Ms. Fan's concern that the structure is too close to their property. Since both neighbors had <br />expressed concern with the loss of views from their properties, staff recommends that the <br />landscaping be a combination of medium- and tall-growing evergreen shrubs that would grow to <br />a maximum of 6-8 ft. tall and 10-12 ft. tall, respectively. Staff also recommends that the <br />applicants be required to record a restrictive covenant against the property to require that the <br />landscape screening remain so long as the second unit remains on the property. <br />PAP-117 Planning Commission <br />Page 12 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.