Laserfiche WebLink
sensitive way within the City, we are close to build-out and she thinks this project is in keeping <br />with the Vineyard corridor and what is currently out there and what will go out there in the future. <br />Councilmember McGovern spoke of her first joint Planning Commission meeting, said she <br />heard a consensus in 2004 that we did not need any more huge houses, but starter houses for <br />our children, and she believes the City has gone the opposite direction and allowing huge <br />homes in the hillsides. She cannot fathom that the need for energy and resources is not <br />something we should be looking at and she is saddened to think of the many more hillside <br />residences will be huge homes incorporating cabanas, large garages, pool houses, green <br />houses and extra barns. <br />Councilmember Sullivan thought so many people can work so long to come up with a specific <br />plan and put into place some very good guidelines and all it takes is 3 votes to ignore it, and this <br />is what is disappointing to him. Councilmember McGovern agreed. <br />Motion: It was m/s by Thorne/Cook-Kallio to introduce Ordinance No. 1974 approving an <br />application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to subdivide an <br />approximately 20-acre site into two single-family residential lots: (1) an approximately one-acre <br />parcel which would include the existing residence and a new detached two-car garage; and <br />(2) an approximately 19-acre parcel which would include: (a) an approximately <br />9,990-square-foot, two-story home with a 3,150-square-foot habitable basement with second <br />unit; (b) a 1,785-square-foot five-car attached garage; (c) a 660-square-foot cabana; (d) a <br />165-square-foot pool bathroom; and (e) a 165-square-foot greenhouse. The property is located <br />at 5 Tuscany Place (formerly 1630 Vineyard Avenue), in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific <br />Plan Area, and is zoned PUD-LDR/HR/OS (Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential/Hillside Residential/Open Space) District; with the amendment that all out buildings <br />return to the Planning Commission and with modified language relating to water use which was <br />agreed upon by Mary Roberts and the Sarich's. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: Councilmembers McGovern and Sullivan <br />Absent: None <br />Mayor Hosterman asked whether or not the Council required the applicant to achieve a higher <br />green point system. Councilmember Sullivan thought the Council might want to look at <br />commercial green building points due to the size of the home. Councilmember Cook-Kallio said <br />she was not sure what additional items would be requested in terms of green points. Mayor <br />Hosterman suggested that the applicant hire an expert to be used in measuring greenhouse gas <br />emissions and ask those experts to strategize ways of reducing them, and she asked that this <br />be added as a condition. The City has joined ICLEI and is undergoing that process now. <br />Councilmember McGovern supported requiring the applicants to measure their carbon footprint, <br />voiced concerns with water and suggested water conservation measures for the project. <br />Motion: It was m/s by Hosterman/Sullivan to require an additional condition for the applicant to <br />hire an expert to be used in measuring greenhouse gas emissions and that those experts <br />determine ways of reducing them. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />City Council Minutes 10 March 18, 2008 <br />