Laserfiche WebLink
2. If the "local match" approach is selected, what is an acceptable upper limit range for <br />the fee? <br />Staff recommends keeping the same local match level of 20%. <br />3. Does the upper limit range depend on the projects funded? <br />a. Example: Should the TVTC pursue a hybrid funding approach with 100% for the <br />original "List A" projects and a "local match" for the list B projects? <br />Staff recommends that the funding level remain the same, but that priority of projects <br />be given to the original list. <br />Figure 3 - 100% and 20% Funding of 22 TVTC Projects by Land Use Type <br />$zs,ooo <br />$24,000 $22,710 <br />$22,000 $20,800 <br />$20,000 <br />$18,000 <br />$16,000,1 <br />$1a,oooi~ $12 238 $12,100 <br />$1s,ooo~: <br />.~ <br />$10,000 ~ ~~ <br />$8,430 <br />$8,oool ~, . <br />$s,ooo $4,542 $4,160 <br />$a,ooo $2.448 $2,420 <br />$2,000 $1,686 <br />$0 ____ <br />Single Family Multi-Family Retail per Office per 1,000 Industrial per <br />1,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. <br />Discussion of fee amounts and funding priority is scheduled to occur at the Tri-Valley <br />Transportation Council on April 30, 2008. It is anticipated that the fee discussion will <br />take several meetings to reach consensus on funding changes. Should the TVTC not <br />find unanimous support, the fee will continue as it currently exists as shown in Figure 1. <br />Submitted by: <br />Rob Wilson <br />Public Works Director <br />Fiscal Review: <br />,~,ti~ , <br />David P. Culver <br />Finance Director <br />Approved <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />