My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-88- 26
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC-88- 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:35:20 AM
Creation date
3/26/2008 12:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/1988
DOCUMENT NO
PC-88- 26
DOCUMENT NAME
SP-87-1
NOTES
TMI ANALYSTS, INC
NOTES 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS AS REQUIRED BY CEQA FOR TMI SPECIFIC PLAN
NOTES 3
NW CRNR OF INTERSECTION I-680 AND BERNAL AVE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the Project site. The City Council finds that this impact <br />cannot be avoided ezcept by adoption of the No Project <br />Alternative, which alternative totally eliminates the-benefits <br />of the Project as set forth above. The City Council further <br />finds that all the social, economic and other considerations <br />set forth herein above warrant approval of the project <br />notwithstanding this significant unavoidable adverse impact. <br />__ IV. _ FTNDINGu~ REGARDING, PR07ECT-ALTERNATIVES _ _._ -_ <br />A. No Project Alternative. <br />This alternative would not adopt the specific plan, <br />leaving the Project site in its current state without a <br />specific plan. This alternative would delay development of the <br />site and maintain current grazing and agricultural uses. <br />1. Facts. The DEIR indicates on page 88 that <br />significant visual and archeological impacts associated with <br />residential development of this site would not occur under this <br />alternative. Further, traffic impacts requiring improvements <br />to roadways and to freeway ramps at Bernal Avenue would occur, <br />but at a slower rate. The DEIR indicates on page 88 that <br />establishment of the Alviso Adobe Historic Park would be <br />delayed under this alternative. In addition, the Project site <br />has already been identified as a residential area in the <br />general plan. <br />2. Findings. The City Council finds that the No <br />Project Alternative is infeasible and less desirable than the <br />47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.