My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
033108
>
05B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2008 11:21:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2008 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br />For those readers looking for additional information on these net adjustments, the Appendix A2 and <br />A3 tables provide some by-grade figures for each school. This includes both the actual amounts in <br />October 2007 and what the enrollments could be next fall if the district allowed the current levels of <br />intra- and inter-district attendance to continue at each school.t0 These are simply theoretical numbers <br />that have been provided to help the district in determining what changes to those levels may be <br />warranted. The actual levels that will be permitted in 2008-09 will, of course, be driven by capacity <br />constraints, especially for class size reduction, and other district decisions, such as for staffing. <br />Underlying Factors to the Projections: Trends in Existing Housins~ <br />There are three key components underlying the forecast: (1) student population trends between the <br />grades ("advancement rates") in existing housing, (2) the likely evolution of the pending kindergarten <br />amounts in each neighborhood and (3) students from new dwellings. The subsections below (with <br />italicized headers) discuss our trend findings within the existing homes. The likely enrollment impacts <br />of new residences are explained later in the main (bold header) section that starts on page 17. <br />Our recent reports had both district-wide and by-housing-category tables for the "advancement rates" <br />from "existing housing", but we have shifted the latter table (previously Table 4) to Appendix 61 in this <br />document. The new Table 4 (discussed later) instead covers the population changes in the lowest <br />grades in particular. That is followed by a new Table 5 that shows, for the first time in our reports, how <br />the local birth counts have been evolving. Both of these tables deal with the question of whether this <br />year's higher kindergarten total is likely to continue, which is probably the most significant short-term <br />and mid-range issue for the district enrollment. <br />Recent Resident Populations and Advancement Rates from Existing Housing in Aggregate <br />Table 3, on page 9, provides a summary of the recent district-wide changes from "existing housing" <br />(i.e., built before the start of the trend analysis period, which is prior to October 2003 in this study). <br />There are two types of data presented in this table: student totals by grade and "advancement rates" <br />entering each grade. The latter are calcu-ations of the net change in the number of students in each <br />grade as they "graduate" into the next grade in the following school year. These figures are most <br />applicable to an accurate forecast when they are determined specifically for students from existing <br />housing. For example, if there had been a total of 100 students in kindergarten last year and 105 in <br />first grade this year from the same group of homes, that would be a 5% (1.05) net advancement rate <br />gain. <br />Such rates usually are averaged over the last several years within each single-grade advancement to <br />avoid giving too much influence to nuances that may have occurred in any one year. For this study, we <br />have determined and evaluated several recent averages, including over four years (2003-2007), as are <br />shown in the bottom row of Table 3, as well as for three years (2004-2007) and weighted over four <br />years (2003-2007, with the last year of change weighted by 150%), which are provided in Appendix <br />B2. These rates are then evaluated for their likelihood to continue. <br />The following discussion focuses on the rates shown in Table 3. Many of these comments are <br />repeated from our last report to make a point of where the findings are virtually unchanged. <br />10 The net inter- and intra-district adjustments have been advanced by one grade for next fall's estimates at each <br />school, with minute revisions where necessary to correlate with the aggregate projections in each grade. <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.