My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
033108
>
05B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2008 11:21:00 AM
Creation date
3/21/2008 11:17:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
05B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Projected Enrollments from 2007 to 2017 Pleasanton Unified School District <br />students (in K-5) in 2008 and 114 students over the next four years. The result would be an average <br />of 689 resident students for each of those schools.a <br />The remaining elementary regions can be summarized as having only limited projected changes in the <br />northwest and north central parts of the district (i.e., for Lydiksen, Donlon and Walnut Grove), but more <br />significantly in the northeast and east central sections (i.e., for Fairlands, Mohr and Alisal). The former <br />group has some yearly fluctuations but none of those areas is projected (through 2011) to have net <br />resident shifts by more than 22 from the current amounts. Fairlands, by contrast, is slated to lose 26 <br />resident students in the next year alone and could be down by 40 in 2011. Since that region has the <br />largest over-planned-capacity figure (-268), however, such a resident reduction may be beneficial. <br />Also projected for a declining population is the Mohr region. That could be off by 55 students to 2011. <br />The adjacent Alisal area, by contrast, could add 60 students during those four years, but the resultant <br />619 resident students would only slightly exceed the planning capacity for 600. <br />Short-Term Projections in the Secondary School Attendance Areas <br />The projected short-term shifts in the secondary regions are generally in-sync at the middle school <br />level while being divergent between the two main high schools, but these are all relatively modest <br />changes. Next year's resident middle school totals are nearly stable in ranging from a nominal gain of <br />eight students (for Pleasanton Middle) to a loss of 13 (for Harvest Park). The Pleasanton and Harvest <br />Park regions also have only modest declines of 29 and 20 resident students, respectively, to 2011. <br />The Hart region is forecast for the greatest loss during that time, with a decline by 69, but that area also <br />has the largest current resident total, so the result could be more comparable totals between the three <br />regions. We should note that the current net adjustment amounts for Hart (-71) and Harvest Park (+97) <br />are more than these projected resident changes. Intra-district decisions thus could be the larger factor <br />in any enrollment shifts at this grade level. <br />The high school regions, as for the middle schools, were accurately projected for this year (at well <br />within 1 % for most and 2% for all of the six secondary regions shown in Table 2) and did not have the <br />localized shifts of the elementaries, so the forecast is essentially unchanged from a year ago. What did <br />shift for the high school grades, however, is that previously the peak was still to come, whereas it now <br />has been reached.9 The result is that the four-year forecast differences have fewer students than <br />before for both Amador Valley and Foothill. The resident total for the former region now fluctuates <br />within 35 of the current amount (rather than growing by 46) over the next four years. The Foothill <br />region, which had the greatest resident swing of any attendance area due to (the accurately projected) <br />growth in the last year, again has a projected decline in 2008. That decline by 43, however, is now <br />strictly negative rather than being a net offset (of the previous year's gains). <br />s The projected resident totals have changed notably in a few attendance areas, including for Valley View among <br />these three regions, since our last report. The main reasons are (1) shifts in expected new housing amounts <br />and locations, (2) the latest birth data and (3) the current resident counts, especially the rise in kindergarten. <br />Our forecast for the recently expanded Lydiksen area, for example, was correct for this year (with 663 actual <br />resident students versus 664 projected), but we are no longer expecting as much pending growth. Declining <br />births and delayed new housing projects are the principal causes of that difference. Our forecast in some of <br />the other elementary regions, by contrast, was low due to the larger-than-expected current kindergarten and <br />that has added to their short-term projections as well. Of particular note is the change for Walnut Grove, with <br />32 more resident students than expected and modest projected further growth by 22 students to 2011, rather <br />than the previous expectation of a small reduction. <br />9 The high school option areas, within which students can choose to attend either Amador Valley or Foothill High <br />without needing a formal intra-district transfer, reached an interim peak in 2006 and have a lower current total. <br />Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.