Laserfiche WebLink
proposed home near the existing barn/garage. Staff found that this location would <br />require considerable grading likely equal to or greater than what is proposed as well as <br />significant retaining walls (12-foot plus) to accommodate the proposed home. <br />Therefore, staff evaluated the proposed location for the home and believes that with the <br />proposed mitigations, reduction of the aboveground living area, and the proposal to <br />keep a larger area of the original grade around the home, the proposed home site is <br />preferable. <br />The Specific Plan also indicates that site development standards such as lot sizes and <br />dimensions, building setbacks, and building height shall be implemented through the <br />City's PUD development plan approval process and may vary for unusual site <br />conditions as long as any new standards are consistent with the intent of the Specific <br />Plan. For the Reznick PUD, two-story homes up to 27 feet in height were allowed <br />above the 540-foot elevation, subject to certain conditions. Although the proposed <br />house is two-stories and 28.7 feet in height, staff believes that the applicants have done <br />a good job at minimizing the apparent height and mass of the home: a substantial <br />amount of the house is located below grade and would not be visible; the second floor <br />walls have been set back from the first floor walls; the second floor area is about one- <br />third of the first floor area; a retaining wall would be located along the north side of the <br />house, making the base of the northern house wall approximately six-inches to five-feet <br />lower that the natural grade at the top of the retaining wall; the roofline has been broken <br />up; and the house has a relatively shallow (4.5:12) roof pitch. Taken together, staff <br />finds that these measures adequately mitigate the height increase and additional story, <br />and staff can support the house as proposed. <br />Shared Well <br />An existing well located on the Roberts property is shared by both the Sariches and <br />Roberts. The Specific Plan allows existing wells to be used for irrigation after City water <br />is supplied to the existing residence. In addition, the Specific Plan indicates that partial <br />mitigation of the cumulative increase in potable water demand will be provided by water <br />conservation measures. One of those measures states that well water shall be required <br />for irrigation of vineyards and related agricultural uses. There has been discussion that <br />this statement in the Specific Plan only relates to the Vineyard District. The Sariches <br />have indicated that they would like to use the well water to irrigate the proposed <br />vineyards. This is consistent with the Specific Plan, and the water system created for <br />the VACSP was not designed to have City supplies used for irrigation of very large <br />parcels. The new domestic water infrastructure, including the new water tank on the <br />Reznick site, is not sized to serve residential demand along with agricultural uses. <br />Mary Roberts indicates that the existing shared well is not dependable and that any use <br />of the shared well water will likely prevent her from drawing water since the well is not <br />adequate for two families. Staff discussed Mrs. Roberts' concerns with the Sariches <br />and drafted the following condition to address Mrs. Roberts' concerns: <br />Page6of9 <br />