06 ATTACHMENT 1-5 - Laserfiche WebLink

Dnrro 7 of 7 Jerry Iserson From: Money2YouNow@aol.com Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:16 PM To: Jerry Iserson Cc: George Thomas Subject: Haps Jerry Please find attached the last letter I sent to Mike Connors re; Haps use of the gate. Although they wear me out with their behavior from time to time, I will try and continue to be professional with them. Today went by without incident (the first) so maybe they are planning to address a few of their problems instead of harassing us. As I have heard rumors today about a public hearing I once again want to clarify my position on the gate and wall. I do not approve of the city instituting a public hearing for a modification of either of my PUD's for 30 W. Neal or 55 W. Angela. I consider the design of the gate and wall reviewed and approved by staff. Also please remember that multiple senior staff members, other than Marion Pavan, of all three departments, personally informed me that no approval was necessary for the 6' wall coupled with the fact that to date no examples of "policy" have been produced nor has their been found any language in the municipal code to support another review of the wall. Haps is also afforded a free enclosed service yard and I have now been awarded some relief from their unsanitary conditions, abusive trespassing habits and profane language and gestures .Simply stated the city reviewed my plans over a several day period before approving them and on top of that Mr. Madden and Connors were informed well in advance of the construction with an additional onsite review by them the day that the wall was started with no objections being heard until after completion. Jerry, Haps, Connors and Madden have no legal right, what so ever, to use my land. It is, after all, PRIVATE PROPERTY. The use of the gate for Pleasanton Garbage's access to the Haps dumpsters is at our sole discretion. Please remember that Mr. McColm at 350 main street has garbage pickups every morning with multi 90-gallon containers at the curb for which a similar available service from Pleasanton Garbage would accommodate Haps with no impact on the downtown. Should staff proceed with a hearing, and even though I have made this request on other occasions, I want to be clear it is essential that the Haps 1997 conditions of approval be up for review at the same time to avoid prejudice against all of the surrounding properties. If there is a form to sign or a fee to pay please let me know as we all feel it would be a good idea if they are unable to straighten up their act on their own. Mitch Pereira 9/14/2007